30 May
2013
30 May
'13
5:41 p.m.
Hi
We speak with Tudor about mixing layout, and here is something
I try.
====================================
| view rawView |
rawView
:= ROView new.
view := ROMondrianViewBuilder view:
rawView.
"-------------"
"-------------"
view shape rectangle
borderColor: (Color white).
view nodes: ROObject withAllSubclasses
forEach: [ :each |
view nodes: each withAllSubclasses .
view
edgesFrom: #superclass.
view layout: (ROTreeLayout new horizontalGap:
4) .
].
view layout:( RORectanglePackingLayout new ratioWidth: 100
height: 100 ).
"-------------"
"-------------"
"Below is the
initiation of the menu and opening the visualization"
ROEaselMorphic new
populateMenuOn: view.
view open
=======================================
So, it seems it can be done
with not too long a script.
Regards
Math
30 May
30 May
9:57 p.m.
Hi,
Not really. You could do it because you in your example you controlled the objects
corresponding to the roots of the hierarchy.
Here is my challenge. Make this graph layout the trees it can and wrap the lines
afterwards:
view nodes: (1 to: 100).
view edgesFrom: [ :x | x atRandom ].
:)
For everyone else: the idea is to be able to compose layouts out of layout pieces. For
example, we should be able to apply a tree layout and then arrange the resulting trees in
a flow layout or in a compact rectangle layout.
Cheers,
Doru
On May 30, 2013, at 5:41 PM, mathieubmddehouck(a)mailoo.org wrote:
Hi
We speak with Tudor about mixing layout, and here is something I try.
====================================
| view rawView |
rawView := ROView new.
view := ROMondrianViewBuilder view: rawView.
"-------------"
"-------------"
view shape rectangle borderColor: (Color white).
view nodes: ROObject withAllSubclasses forEach: [ :each |
view nodes: each withAllSubclasses .
view edgesFrom: #superclass.
view layout: (ROTreeLayout new horizontalGap: 4) .
].
view layout:( RORectanglePackingLayout new ratioWidth: 100 height: 100 ).
"-------------"
"-------------"
"Below is the initiation of the menu and opening the visualization"
ROEaselMorphic new populateMenuOn: view.
view open
=======================================
So, it seems it can be done with not too long a script.
Regards
Math
<test 2 layouts.png>_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
--
www.tudorgirba.com
"Reasonable is what we are accustomed with."
10:24 p.m.
On May 30, 2013, at 9:57 PM, Tudor Girba <tudor(a)tudorgirba.com> wrote:
Hi,
Not really. You could do it because you in your example you controlled the objects
corresponding to the roots of the hierarchy.
Here is my challenge. Make this graph layout the trees it can and wrap the lines
afterwards:
view nodes: (1 to: 100).
view edgesFrom: [ :x | x atRandom ].
:)
For everyone else: the idea is to be able to compose layouts out of layout pieces. For
example, we should be able to apply a tree layout and then arrange the resulting trees in
a flow layout or in a compact rectangle layout.
Not easy :)
Cheers,
Doru
On May 30, 2013, at 5:41 PM, mathieubmddehouck(a)mailoo.org wrote:
Hi
We speak with Tudor about mixing layout, and here is something I try.
====================================
| view rawView |
rawView := ROView new.
view := ROMondrianViewBuilder view: rawView.
"-------------"
"-------------"
view shape rectangle borderColor: (Color white).
view nodes: ROObject withAllSubclasses forEach: [ :each |
view nodes: each withAllSubclasses .
view edgesFrom: #superclass.
view layout: (ROTreeLayout new horizontalGap: 4) .
].
view layout:( RORectanglePackingLayout new ratioWidth: 100 height: 100 ).
"-------------"
"-------------"
"Below is the initiation of the menu and opening the visualization"
ROEaselMorphic new populateMenuOn: view.
view open
=======================================
So, it seems it can be done with not too long a script.
Regards
Math
<test 2 layouts.png>_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
--
www.tudorgirba.com
"Reasonable is what we are accustomed with."
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev 
31 May
31 May
12:07 p.m.
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 9:57 PM, Tudor Girba <tudor(a)tudorgirba.com> wrote:
Hi,
Not really. You could do it because you in your example you controlled the
objects corresponding to the roots of the hierarchy.
But by definition, the tree has always a root. In my opinion the
computation of the root is the necessary step in a layout involving trees.
You can compute the root by looking at the incoming connections and setting
as the root the one which does not have any, or has the least?. We had this
problem when we have to represent a graph as a tree, we ask the user to
provide the root.
Here is my challenge. Make this graph layout the trees it can and wrap the
lines afterwards:
view nodes: (1 to: 100).
view edgesFrom: [ :x | x atRandom ].
:)
For everyone else: the idea is to be able to compose layouts out of layout
pieces. For example, we should be able to apply a tree layout and then
arrange the resulting trees in a flow layout or in a compact rectangle
layout.
Cheers,
Doru
On May 30, 2013, at 5:41 PM, mathieubmddehouck(a)mailoo.org wrote:
Hi
We speak with Tudor about mixing layout, and here is something I try.
====================================
| view rawView |
rawView := ROView new.
view := ROMondrianViewBuilder view: rawView.
"-------------"
"-------------"
view shape rectangle borderColor: (Color white).
view nodes: ROObject withAllSubclasses forEach: [ :each |
view nodes: each withAllSubclasses .
view edgesFrom: #superclass.
view layout: (ROTreeLayout new horizontalGap: 4) .
].
view layout:( RORectanglePackingLayout new ratioWidth: 100
height: 100 ).
"-------------"
"-------------"
"Below is the initiation of the menu and opening the visualization"
ROEaselMorphic new populateMenuOn: view.
view open
=======================================
So, it seems it can be done with not too long a script.
Regards
Math
<test 2 layouts.png>_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
--
www.tudorgirba.com
"Reasonable is what we are accustomed with."
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
1:05 p.m.
:) Look at the example I provided. The TreeLayout can identify some roots,
but you do not know the roots without applying a graph algorithm first.
Cheers,
Doru
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 12:07 PM, Usman Bhatti <usman.bhatti(a)gmail.com>wrote;wrote:
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 9:57 PM, Tudor Girba <tudor(a)tudorgirba.com> wrote:
--
www.tudorgirba.com
"Every thing has its own flow"
Hi,
Not really. You could do it because you in your example you controlled
the objects corresponding to the roots of the hierarchy.
But by definition, the tree has always a root. In my opinion the
computation of the root is the necessary step in a layout involving trees.
You can compute the root by looking at the incoming connections and setting
as the root the one which does not have any, or has the least?. We had this
problem when we have to represent a graph as a tree, we ask the user to
provide the root.
Here is my challenge. Make this graph layout the trees it can and wrap
the lines afterwards:
view nodes: (1 to: 100).
view edgesFrom: [ :x | x atRandom ].
:)
For everyone else: the idea is to be able to compose layouts out of
layout pieces. For example, we should be able to apply a tree layout and
then arrange the resulting trees in a flow layout or in a compact rectangle
layout.
Cheers,
Doru
On May 30, 2013, at 5:41 PM, mathieubmddehouck(a)mailoo.org wrote:
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Hi
We speak with Tudor about mixing layout, and here is something I try.
====================================
| view rawView |
rawView := ROView new.
view := ROMondrianViewBuilder view: rawView.
"-------------"
"-------------"
view shape rectangle borderColor: (Color white).
view nodes: ROObject withAllSubclasses forEach: [ :each |
view nodes: each withAllSubclasses .
view edgesFrom: #superclass.
view layout: (ROTreeLayout new horizontalGap: 4) .
].
view layout:( RORectanglePackingLayout new ratioWidth: 100
height: 100 ).
"-------------"
"-------------"
"Below is the initiation of the menu and opening the visualization"
ROEaselMorphic new populateMenuOn: view.
view open
=======================================
So, it seems it can be done with not too long a script.
Regards
Math
<test 2 layouts.png>_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
--
www.tudorgirba.com
"Reasonable is what we are accustomed with."
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
3986
days inactive
3987
days old
4 comments
4 participants
participants (4)
-
mathieubmddehouck＠mailoo.org -
Stéphane Ducasse -
Tudor Girba -
Usman Bhatti