16 May
2012
16 May
'12
7:32 p.m.
Hello,
I am constructing a tree presentation with Glamour. Parents are modules in
my tree and children are a module's functions. Here is the code:
modulesIn: composite
^ composite tree
title: 'All Modules';
showOnly: 50;
display: [ :each | each allModules];
tags: [ :each |
{each numberOfFunctions asString} ];
format: [ :each | each mooseName];
selectionAct: [:each | each selection inspect ] on: $i entitled: 'Inspect';
icon: #mooseIcon;
children: [:each | each functions ].
Now, when I click on a child, glamour wants to executes the children and
tags block on a function in the above code. Now since my functions do not
understand the messages functions/numberOfFunctions, there is an error.
My question: for constructing a glamour tree, should parents and children
both understand the same API or am I missing something here?
thanx
Usman
16 May
16 May
8:50 p.m.
Hi,
The children block is applied to every child. So, naturally, it has to work on every child
:). So, one possibility to describe your situation would be like:
children: [:each | each isModule ifTrue: [each functions] ifFalse: [#()]]
Another possibility would be to define the elements by level. There is a default variable
on the last position in the block that holds the level of the current child. Please take a
look at GLMBasicExamples>>treeWithChildrenByLevel.
Cheers,
Doru
On 16 May 2012, at 19:32, Usman Bhatti wrote:
Hello,
I am constructing a tree presentation with Glamour. Parents are modules in my tree and
children are a module's functions. Here is the code:
modulesIn: composite
^ composite tree
title: 'All Modules';
showOnly: 50;
display: [ :each | each allModules];
tags: [ :each |
{each numberOfFunctions asString} ];
format: [ :each | each mooseName];
selectionAct: [:each | each selection inspect ] on: $i entitled: 'Inspect';
icon: #mooseIcon;
children: [:each | each functions ].
Now, when I click on a child, glamour wants to executes the children and tags block on a
function in the above code. Now since my functions do not understand the messages
functions/numberOfFunctions, there is an error.
My question: for constructing a glamour tree, should parents and children both understand
the same API or am I missing something here?
thanx
Usman
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
--
www.tudorgirba.com
"From an abstract enough point of view, any two things are similar."
9:29 p.m.
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 8:50 PM, Tudor Girba <tudor(a)tudorgirba.com> wrote:
Hi,
The children block is applied to every child. So, naturally, it has to
work on every child :). So, one possibility to describe your situation
would be like:
children: [:each | each isModule ifTrue: [each functions] ifFalse:
[#()]]
Another possibility would be to define the elements by level. There is a
default variable on the last position in the block that holds the level of
the current child. Please take a look at
GLMBasicExamples>>treeWithChildrenByLevel.
In fact, I and André had discussed the same solutions before sending the
mail :-). But I was thinking there might be a way to apply different
treatment to roots and children nodes without conditional checks.
thanx
Usman
Cheers,
Doru
On 16 May 2012, at 19:32, Usman Bhatti wrote:
Hello,
I am constructing a tree presentation with Glamour. Parents are modules
in my tree
and children are a module's functions. Here is the code:
modulesIn: composite
^ composite tree
title: 'All Modules';
showOnly: 50;
display: [ :each | each allModules];
tags: [ :each |
{each numberOfFunctions asString}
];
format: [ :each | each
mooseName];
selectionAct: [:each | each selection inspect ]
on: $i
entitled: 'Inspect';
icon: #mooseIcon;
children: [:each | each functions ].
Now, when I click on a child, glamour wants to executes the children and
tags
block on a function in the above code. Now since my functions do not
understand the messages functions/numberOfFunctions, there is an error.
My question: for constructing a glamour tree, should parents and
children both
understand the same API or am I missing something here?
thanx
Usman
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
--
www.tudorgirba.com
"From an abstract enough point of view, any two things are similar."
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
4603
days inactive
4603
days old
2 comments
2 participants
participants (2)
-
Tudor Girba -
Usman Bhatti