Hello Alex,
running JavaSupport4MOOSE on some 1.4 code worked but yields funny results
- each class is listed 8 times, should be once only - all classes are listed as part of default package, should be proper package - all access go to objects rather than attributes, including a funny object named #, - class scope is missing for all attributes and methods - type and return type is missing for all attributes and methods - parameters of methods are missing - stub classes are missing, or not properly linked to model - inner classes are completely missing - some inheritances are missing, for example BagTest has no superclass, but should be TestCase
cheers, AA
Purpose was to learn about moose with this project. I am not arguing it is bulletproof.
Alexandre
On 18 Dec 2007, at 09:48, Adrian Kuhn wrote:
Hello Alex,
running JavaSupport4MOOSE on some 1.4 code worked but yields funny results
- each class is listed 8 times, should be once only
- all classes are listed as part of default package, should be proper
package
- all access go to objects rather than attributes, including a funny
object named #,
- class scope is missing for all attributes and methods
- type and return type is missing for all attributes and methods
- parameters of methods are missing
- stub classes are missing, or not properly linked to model
- inner classes are completely missing
- some inheritances are missing, for example BagTest has no
superclass, but should be TestCase
cheers, AA
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
alex it would be good to fix that :) if you check in the importer normally there was ensureXXX which returned if already created or created the corresponding entity.
stef
On 18 déc. 07, at 16:31, Bergel, Alexandre wrote:
Purpose was to learn about moose with this project. I am not arguing it is bulletproof.
Alexandre
On 18 Dec 2007, at 09:48, Adrian Kuhn wrote:
Hello Alex,
running JavaSupport4MOOSE on some 1.4 code worked but yields funny results
- each class is listed 8 times, should be once only
- all classes are listed as part of default package, should be proper
package
- all access go to objects rather than attributes, including a funny
object named #,
- class scope is missing for all attributes and methods
- type and return type is missing for all attributes and methods
- parameters of methods are missing
- stub classes are missing, or not properly linked to model
- inner classes are completely missing
- some inheritances are missing, for example BagTest has no
superclass, but should be TestCase
cheers, AA
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
-- _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Hey Alex,
no one expects Moose code to be bulletproof :) it is cool that you are doing this work, I am actually quite happy that someone as productive as you joined the Moose crowd.
For bug reports, the netiquette on Moose-dev is to say "thank you" when you receive bug reports. It is not taken for granted that people report bugs, usually they just say "fucking shit" for themselves and turn away from Moose and we never learn of our bugs. No one has to explain his bugs, bugs are just there ... there to be reported and fixed.
Keep up the cool work! cheers, AA
On 18 Dec 2007, at 16:31 , Bergel, Alexandre wrote:
Purpose was to learn about moose with this project. I am not arguing it is bulletproof.
Alexandre
On 18 Dec 2007, at 09:48, Adrian Kuhn wrote:
Hello Alex,
running JavaSupport4MOOSE on some 1.4 code worked but yields funny results
- each class is listed 8 times, should be once only
- all classes are listed as part of default package, should be proper
package
- all access go to objects rather than attributes, including a funny
object named #,
- class scope is missing for all attributes and methods
- type and return type is missing for all attributes and methods
- parameters of methods are missing
- stub classes are missing, or not properly linked to model
- inner classes are completely missing
- some inheritances are missing, for example BagTest has no
superclass, but should be TestCase
cheers, AA
you are right. :) I appreciate feedback Stef
On 18 déc. 07, at 17:10, Adrian Kuhn wrote:
Hey Alex,
no one expects Moose code to be bulletproof :) it is cool that you are doing this work, I am actually quite happy that someone as productive as you joined the Moose crowd.
For bug reports, the netiquette on Moose-dev is to say "thank you" when you receive bug reports. It is not taken for granted that people report bugs, usually they just say "fucking shit" for themselves and turn away from Moose and we never learn of our bugs. No one has to explain his bugs, bugs are just there ... there to be reported and fixed.
Keep up the cool work! cheers, AA
On 18 Dec 2007, at 16:31 , Bergel, Alexandre wrote:
Purpose was to learn about moose with this project. I am not arguing it is bulletproof.
Alexandre
On 18 Dec 2007, at 09:48, Adrian Kuhn wrote:
Hello Alex,
running JavaSupport4MOOSE on some 1.4 code worked but yields funny results
- each class is listed 8 times, should be once only
- all classes are listed as part of default package, should be
proper package
- all access go to objects rather than attributes, including a funny
object named #,
- class scope is missing for all attributes and methods
- type and return type is missing for all attributes and methods
- parameters of methods are missing
- stub classes are missing, or not properly linked to model
- inner classes are completely missing
- some inheritances are missing, for example BagTest has no
superclass, but should be TestCase
cheers, AA
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
-
Adrian Kuhn -
Bergel, Alexandre -
Stéphane Ducasse