18 Dec
2007
18 Dec
'07
1:48 p.m.
Hello Alex,
running JavaSupport4MOOSE on some 1.4 code worked but yields funny
results
- each class is listed 8 times, should be once only
- all classes are listed as part of default package, should be proper
package
- all access go to objects rather than attributes, including a funny
object named #,
- class scope is missing for all attributes and methods
- type and return type is missing for all attributes and methods
- parameters of methods are missing
- stub classes are missing, or not properly linked to model
- inner classes are completely missing
- some inheritances are missing, for example BagTest has no
superclass, but should be TestCase
cheers,
AA
18 Dec
18 Dec
4:31 p.m.
New subject: Java Import runs with 1.4 code but yields funny result
Purpose was to learn about moose with this project. I am not arguing
it is bulletproof.
Alexandre
On 18 Dec 2007, at 09:48, Adrian Kuhn wrote:
Hello Alex,
running JavaSupport4MOOSE on some 1.4 code worked but yields funny
results
- each class is listed 8 times, should be once only
- all classes are listed as part of default package, should be proper
package
- all access go to objects rather than attributes, including a funny
object named #,
- class scope is missing for all attributes and methods
- type and return type is missing for all attributes and methods
- parameters of methods are missing
- stub classes are missing, or not properly linked to model
- inner classes are completely missing
- some inheritances are missing, for example BagTest has no
superclass, but should be TestCase
cheers,
AA
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
--
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
4:53 p.m.
New subject: Java Import runs with 1.4 code but yields funny result
alex it would be good to fix that :)
if you check in the importer normally there was ensureXXX which
returned if already created or created the corresponding entity.
stef
On 18 déc. 07, at 16:31, Bergel, Alexandre wrote:
Purpose was to learn about moose with this project. I
am not arguing
it is bulletproof.
Alexandre
On 18 Dec 2007, at 09:48, Adrian Kuhn wrote:
Hello Alex,
running JavaSupport4MOOSE on some 1.4 code worked but yields funny
results
- each class is listed 8 times, should be once only
- all classes are listed as part of default package, should be proper
package
- all access go to objects rather than attributes, including a funny
object named #,
- class scope is missing for all attributes and methods
- type and return type is missing for all attributes and methods
- parameters of methods are missing
- stub classes are missing, or not properly linked to model
- inner classes are completely missing
- some inheritances are missing, for example BagTest has no
superclass, but should be TestCase
cheers,
AA
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
--
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
5:10 p.m.
New subject: Java Import runs with 1.4 code but yields funny result
Hey Alex,
no one expects Moose code to be bulletproof :) it is cool that you
are doing this work, I am actually quite happy that someone as
productive as you joined the Moose crowd.
For bug reports, the netiquette on Moose-dev is to say "thank you"
when you receive bug reports. It is not taken for granted that people
report bugs, usually they just say "fucking shit" for themselves and
turn away from Moose and we never learn of our bugs. No one has to
explain his bugs, bugs are just there ... there to be reported and
fixed.
Keep up the cool work!
cheers,
AA
On 18 Dec 2007, at 16:31 , Bergel, Alexandre wrote:
Purpose was to learn about moose with this project. I
am not arguing
it is bulletproof.
Alexandre
On 18 Dec 2007, at 09:48, Adrian Kuhn wrote:
> Hello Alex,
>
> running JavaSupport4MOOSE on some 1.4 code worked but yields funny
> results
>
> - each class is listed 8 times, should be once only
> - all classes are listed as part of default package, should be proper
> package
> - all access go to objects rather than attributes, including a funny
> object named #,
> - class scope is missing for all attributes and methods
> - type and return type is missing for all attributes and methods
> - parameters of methods are missing
> - stub classes are missing, or not properly linked to model
> - inner classes are completely missing
> - some inheritances are missing, for example BagTest has no
> superclass, but should be TestCase
>
> cheers,
> AA
>
19 Dec
19 Dec
1:43 p.m.
New subject: Java Import runs with 1.4 code but yields funny result
you are right. :)
I appreciate feedback
Stef
On 18 déc. 07, at 17:10, Adrian Kuhn wrote:
Hey Alex,
no one expects Moose code to be bulletproof :) it is cool that you
are doing this work, I am actually quite happy that someone as
productive as you joined the Moose crowd.
For bug reports, the netiquette on Moose-dev is to say "thank you"
when you receive bug reports. It is not taken for granted that people
report bugs, usually they just say "fucking shit" for themselves and
turn away from Moose and we never learn of our bugs. No one has to
explain his bugs, bugs are just there ... there to be reported and
fixed.
Keep up the cool work!
cheers,
AA
On 18 Dec 2007, at 16:31 , Bergel, Alexandre wrote:
Purpose was to learn about moose with this
project. I am not arguing
it is bulletproof.
Alexandre
On 18 Dec 2007, at 09:48, Adrian Kuhn wrote:
> Hello Alex,
>
> running JavaSupport4MOOSE on some 1.4 code worked but yields funny
> results
>
> - each class is listed 8 times, should be once only
> - all classes are listed as part of default package, should be
> proper
> package
> - all access go to objects rather than attributes, including a funny
> object named #,
> - class scope is missing for all attributes and methods
> - type and return type is missing for all attributes and methods
> - parameters of methods are missing
> - stub classes are missing, or not properly linked to model
> - inner classes are completely missing
> - some inheritances are missing, for example BagTest has no
> superclass, but should be TestCase
>
> cheers,
> AA
>
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
5982
days inactive
5983
days old
4 comments
3 participants
participants (3)
-
Adrian Kuhn -
Bergel, Alexandre -
Stéphane Ducasse