A significant slowdown may be noticed when compared with the previous glamourous report (sent on October 23). Details at the end of the amil. -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- =-= Report produced on 2010-01-16T15:19:06+00:00 ------------------ Opening Browser Benchmark: 15 openings => 2620 ms ------------------ ------------------ Selecting Item in Browser Benchmark 100 size and selections => 2569 ms 200 size and selections => 4359 ms 300 size and selections => 6912 ms 400 size and selections => 8298 ms 500 size and selections => 10414 ms 600 size and selections => 12462 ms 700 size and selections => 14019 ms 800 size and selections => 16123 ms 900 size and selections => 19234 ms 1000 size and selections => 19984 ms 1500 size and selections => 30812 ms 2000 size and selections => 45497 ms ------------------ ------------------ Selecting in finder item Benchmark 1 size and selections => 166 ms 5 size and selections => 897 ms 10 size and selections => 1949 ms 15 size and selections => 2968 ms 20 size and selections => 4008 ms 25 size and selections => 5112 ms 30 size and selections => 11714 ms 35 size and selections => 7686 ms 40 size and selections => 8963 ms 45 size and selections => 10428 ms 50 size and selections => 12471 ms ------------------ 50.66 % of methods are covered from unit tests Progress from last time: +17.19 % -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- =-= From the report generated on Oct 23, we had: Selecting Item Benchmark: 2000 size and selections => 2729 ms Selecting in finder item Benchmark: 50 size and selections => 1881 ms The new version is one magnitude slower. However, opening a browser is slightly faster. The first health report indicated: 15 openings => 3622 ms Cheers, Alexandre _______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev