Hi
romain will start coding a DSM for moose (may be using mondrian may be not). And I would like to represent a cell as a reference aggregate which can contain inheritance def, access, invocation.
Do you have an idea where we could define this class in the FAMIX inheritance tree? We thought abut a subclass of FamixAbstractionAssociation
Stef
I think that is a good solution to have a FAMIXReference class as a first subclass of FAMIXAbstractAssociation: FAMIXInvocation, FAMIXAccess, FAMIXInheritanceDefination, etc. should be the direct subclasses of FAMIXReference.
fAMIXReference>>#isInvocation fAMIXReference>>#isAccess fAMIXReference>>#isInheritance
you do not think that FAMIXDependency is a better name than FAMIXReference?
Hani
On Feb 1, 2008, at 13:57 PM, stéphane ducasse wrote:
Hi
romain will start coding a DSM for moose (may be using mondrian may be not). And I would like to represent a cell as a reference aggregate which can contain inheritance def, access, invocation.
Do you have an idea where we could define this class in the FAMIX inheritance tree? We thought abut a subclass of FamixAbstractionAssociation
Stef _______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
-
Hani ABDEEN -
stéphane ducasse