I would argue strongly against it, because you are
overriding too much the meaning of #edges:.
I agree. I was not sure if edges: should be overloaded or not. That's why I asked.
Instead, I would suggest adding a new selector called
#edgesFromAssociations:.
Now in 2.41 of Mondrian. Tests have been added for this
Cheers,
Alexandre
On 20 Jan 2011, at 14:33, Alexandre Bergel wrote:
Hi!
For the last two years I have been writing code like:
view edges: { obj1 -> obj2 . obj3 -> obj4 } from: #key to: #value.
I have checked your code but I am wondering whether I am the only one
I think it would be cool to be able to write:
view edges: { obj1 -> obj2 . obj3 -> obj4 }
Does it make sense?
Cheers,
Alexandre
--
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel
http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
--
www.tudorgirba.com
"From an abstract enough point of view, any two things are similar."
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
--
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel
http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.