23 Jul
2009
23 Jul
'09
3:20 p.m.
and use plain smalltalk code for queries?
[:each | each named = #sozr and: []]
Stef
23 Jul
23 Jul
3:23 p.m.
New subject: do you think that this is easy to remove the dependency with smacc
You can already do that in the scripting via {each named = #sozr and:
[]}
The idea of this scripting engine was to get it ready for people that
do not know smalltalk and that just want to play with metrics.
But, is there a problem with Smacc?
Doru
On 23 Jul 2009, at 15:20, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
and use plain smalltalk code for queries?
[:each | each named = #sozr and: []]
Stef
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
--
www.tudorgirba.com
"Every thing should have the right to be different."
6:04 p.m.
New subject: do you think that this is easy to remove the dependency with smacc
You can already do that in the scripting via {each
named = #sozr
and: []}
The idea of this scripting engine was to get it ready for people
that do not know smalltalk and that just want to play with metrics.
But, is there a problem with Smacc?
Less is better dependency
and we get the same for free.
Stef
Doru
On 23 Jul 2009, at 15:20, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
and use plain smalltalk code for queries?
[:each | each named = #sozr and: []]
Stef
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
--
www.tudorgirba.com
"Every thing should have the right to be different."
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
5613
days inactive
5613
days old
2 comments
2 participants
participants (2)
-
Stéphane Ducasse -
Tudor Girba