and use plain smalltalk code for queries?
[:each | each named = #sozr and: []]
Stef
You can already do that in the scripting via {each named = #sozr and: []}
The idea of this scripting engine was to get it ready for people that do not know smalltalk and that just want to play with metrics.
But, is there a problem with Smacc?
Doru
On 23 Jul 2009, at 15:20, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
and use plain smalltalk code for queries?
[:each | each named = #sozr and: []]
Stef _______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
-- www.tudorgirba.com
"Every thing should have the right to be different."
You can already do that in the scripting via {each named = #sozr and: []}
The idea of this scripting engine was to get it ready for people that do not know smalltalk and that just want to play with metrics.
But, is there a problem with Smacc?
Less is better dependency and we get the same for free.
Stef
Doru
On 23 Jul 2009, at 15:20, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
and use plain smalltalk code for queries?
[:each | each named = #sozr and: []]
Stef _______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
-- www.tudorgirba.com
"Every thing should have the right to be different."
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
-
Stéphane Ducasse -
Tudor Girba