Hi,

yes, that's perfectly fine! However, calling it "a complete Ruby parser done with SmaCC" is bit too optimistic. It is not complete and never was. Ruby's quite challenging with that respect (well, in many in fact :-)

If it's for analysis (i.e., you want to build FAMIX model and then analyse it), If I were you I'd just use a Ruby parser in Ruby (there are many), let it spit out sexprs and parse them in Smalltalk and make FAMIX model out of that.

If you manage to fix the SmaCC parser, I;d be __very__ interested. Please let me know.

Good luck!

Jan

On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 12:35 PM, Thierry Goubier thierry.goubier@gmail.com wrote:

Hi Serge,

one could ask Jan Vrany about it :). Jan, is that Ok if someone reuse this code (as in adding a Ruby parser to the SmaCC collection) ?

Thierry

2016-06-17 12:18 GMT+02:00 Serge Stinckwich serge.stinckwich@gmail.com:

...

I remember there was some interests here about analyzing Ruby programs with MOOSE, and apparently there is a complete Ruby parser done with SmaCC (Smalltalk/X version): https://swing.fit.cvut.cz/projects/smallruby

Look inside the svn repository to find the code. I dunno the licence.

Regards,

Serge Stinckwich UCBN & UMI UMMISCO 209 (IRD/UPMC) Every DSL ends up being Smalltalk http://www.doesnotunderstand.org/ _______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@list.inf.unibe.ch https://www.list.inf.unibe.ch/listinfo/moose-dev

Hi Jan, hi Thierry,

Thanks for this.

What is the license of the existing parser? Is it MIT?

Cheers, Doru

On Jun 17, 2016, at 2:28 PM, Thierry Goubier thierry.goubier@gmail.com wrote:

Hi Jan,

2016-06-17 14:20 GMT+02:00 Jan Vrany jan.vrany@fit.cvut.cz: Hi,

yes, that's perfectly fine!

Thanks.

However, calling it "a complete Ruby parser done with SmaCC" is bit too optimistic. It is not complete and never was. Ruby's quite challenging with that respect (well, in many in fact :-)

I saw that there are a lot of unimplemented stuff in the grammar... or at least messages saying so :)

If it's for analysis (i.e., you want to build FAMIX model and then analyse it), If I were you I'd just use a Ruby parser in Ruby (there are many), let it spit out sexprs and parse them in Smalltalk and make FAMIX model out of that.

If you manage to fix the SmaCC parser, I;d be __very__ interested. Please let me know.

I will if I do.

Good luck!

Thanks,

Thierry

Jan

On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 12:35 PM, Thierry Goubier thierry.goubier@gmail.com wrote:

...

Hi Serge,

one could ask Jan Vrany about it :). Jan, is that Ok if someone reuse this code (as in adding a Ruby parser to the SmaCC collection) ?

Thierry

2016-06-17 12:18 GMT+02:00 Serge Stinckwich serge.stinckwich@gmail.com: I remember there was some interests here about analyzing Ruby programs with MOOSE, and apparently there is a complete Ruby parser done with SmaCC (Smalltalk/X version): https://swing.fit.cvut.cz/projects/smallruby

Look inside the svn repository to find the code. I dunno the licence.

Regards,

Serge Stinckwich UCBN & UMI UMMISCO 209 (IRD/UPMC) Every DSL ends up being Smalltalk http://www.doesnotunderstand.org/ _______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@list.inf.unibe.ch https://www.list.inf.unibe.ch/listinfo/moose-dev

---

Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@list.inf.unibe.ch https://www.list.inf.unibe.ch/listinfo/moose-dev

-- www.tudorgirba.com www.feenk.com

"We cannot reach the flow of things unless we let go."