Hi,
yes, that's perfectly fine!
However, calling it "a complete Ruby parser done with SmaCC" is
bit too optimistic. It is not complete and never was. Ruby's quite
challenging with that respect (well, in many in fact :-)
If it's for analysis (i.e., you want to build FAMIX model and then analyse it),
If I were you I'd just use a Ruby parser in Ruby (there are many), let it spit out
sexprs and parse them in Smalltalk and make FAMIX model out of that.
If you manage to fix the SmaCC parser, I;d be __very__ interested. Please
let me know.
Good luck!
Jan
On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 12:35 PM, Thierry Goubier <thierry.goubier@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi Serge,
one could ask Jan Vrany about it :). Jan, is that Ok if someone reuse this code (as in adding a Ruby parser to the SmaCC collection) ?
Thierry