14 Aug
2012
14 Aug
'12
9:15 p.m.
On Aug 14, 2012, at 2:45 PM, Alexandre Bergel wrote:
I do not think so. We are talking about different thing.
If a company has already bought VisualWorks, then it can use Moose,
Yes but having in your sentence was not bought. So having VisualWorks is not the correct
term.
I could not check what is the license of CodeCity. If
it is open source, and you already have VisualWorks, then you should be able to use it
without problem.
No this is plain wrong. CodeCity and Jun for free.
Now such company would have to pay attention that JUN is GPL so it means that as soon as
it uses CodeCity and build anything on top or around then it can be forced to publish its
code in GPL.
Now a lot of companies are crappy and use GPL code without any care but this is at their
own risk.
Clearly I will never copy any piece of code from codeCity into MoosePharo because CodeCity
uses JUN and as such it is GPL
and Moose will never be GPL.
Stef
Alexandre
You cannot use VisualWorks in commercial settings
without paying a license to cincom: this applies too to Moose.
Then Jun is under GPL so automatically all you code is GPL.
--
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Cheers,
Alexandre
--
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev