22 Dec
2014
22 Dec
'14
11:03 p.m.
Hi ben
this is cool to know because people here (anne and JC) are looking for a JavaAST
framework.
Stef
On 25 Mar 2014, at 09:16, Benjamin AREZKI <benjamin.arezki(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Yes me I am working on Fast-Java, I did not suceed to
implement it with PetitJava and I am trying to do something with SmaCC written by Thierry
Goubier : https://github.com/ThierryGoubier/SmaCC/tree/master/SmaCC-Java.package.
2014-03-25 8:01 GMT+00:00 Uko2 [via Smalltalk] <[hidden email]>:
Is anyone working on FAST now?
Uko
On 21 Mar 2014, at 19:05, Nicolas Anquetil <[hidden email]> wrote:
Well to do code critics, you would need to have some representation of the source code in
Famix.
Something like a Famix AST.
hummmm ....
somehow this reminds me of something ...
;-)
For those that could not follow, I am hinting here at FAST (FAMIX-AST) a project that
started with FAST-pharo implemented by no other than Yuriy Tymchuk.
But seriously, I think that FAMIX is a bit high level to have many code critics rules.
Andre had implemented some of the rules of smalllint on Famix using arki, but there are
many statement level details that are missing to go very far.
So I come back to my first answer, the solution seems to be FAST
nicolas
On 21/03/2014 16:45, Yuriy Tymchuk wrote:
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion below:
http://forum.world.st/Code-critics-on-FAMIX-tp4750181p4750597.html
To start a new topic under Moose, email [hidden email]
To unsubscribe from Smalltalk, click here.
NAML
View this message in context: Re: Code critics on FAMIX
Sent from the Moose mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev Hi Chris.
The idea is a framework for defining and handling rules. For now on I want to try to
implement something that works on FAMIX because it’s a well defined model which already
has a lot of metrics implemented. We will see how it will work in future. I’d like to have
it in Pharo on the same importance level as SUnit.
Cheers.
Uko
On 21 Mar 2014, at 15:31, Chris Cunningham <[hidden email]> wrote:
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev Cross-language code smells, or a framework to
build a language specific code critic? I don't have either one, but the idea of a
cross-languange code smell is interesting to me.
-cbc
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 7:20 AM, Yuriy Tymchuk <[hidden email]> wrote:
No. I want to work with rules that can find common code smells, and so I wander if
something similar is implemented already.
Uko
Sent from my iPhone
On 21 Mar 2014, at 15:15, Tudor Girba <[hidden email]> wrote:
> What do you mean exactly?
>
> Doru
>
>
> On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 2:55 PM, Yuriy Tymchuk <[hidden email]> wrote:
> Hi everyone.
>
> Can someone tell me if there was any implementation of code critics-like framework on
top of FAMIX?
>
> Regards.
> Yuriy
> _______________________________________________
> Moose-dev mailing list
> [hidden email]
> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
>
>
>
> --
> www.tudorgirba.com
>
> "Every thing has its own flow"
> _______________________________________________
> Moose-dev mailing list
> [hidden email]
> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev