30 Aug
2013
30 Aug
'13
8:22 p.m.
On 30 серп. 2013, at 14:36, Nicolas Anquetil <Nicolas.Anquetil(a)inria.fr> wrote:
great!
thanks a lot for your continuous implication in the project
Well, I'm responsible for what I've created :).
Thank you for helping me during main development stage.
Uko
nicolas
On 08/30/2013 12:14 PM, Yuriy Tymchuk wrote:
Hi everyone!
I've done quite a lot of work on FAST restructuring and now there are 3 separate
projects:
http://www.smalltalkhub.com/#!/~Moose/FASTCore
http://www.smalltalkhub.com/#!/~Moose/FASTPharo
http://www.smalltalkhub.com/#!/~Moose/FASTJava
An image with everything loaded can be fetched from here:
https://ci.inria.fr/moose/job/FAST-On-Moose/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/FA…
Feedback is appreciated :)
Uko
On 20 серп. 2013, at 13:00, Tudor Girba <tudor(a)tudorgirba.com> wrote:
--
Nicolas Anquetil -- RMod research team (Inria)
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev Well, you can start splitting the project anyway.
Doru
On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 11:55 AM, Yuriy Tymchuk <yuriy.tymchuk(a)me.com> wrote:
Ok, so as far as I understand - we'll release Moose 4.8 and then I can start to
integrate FAST into Moose 5?
Uko
On 17 серп. 2013, at 09:15, Yuriy Tymchuk <yuriy.tymchuk(a)me.com> wrote:
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev Yes, I followed Stef's suggestion. Moreover
at the beginning I wasn't so sure about what I'm doing, so I didn't want to
mess directly with FAMIX
Uko
Надіслано з iPhone
16 серп. 2013 о 22:08 Tudor Girba <tudor(a)tudorgirba.com> написав(ла):
> The AST should certainly be separate, like it is now. But, it would be more effective
to have the FAMIX entity directly linked with the AST. I used this pattern on a couple of
projects and it makes querying quite cheap.
>
> Cheers,
> Doru
>
>
> On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 6:19 PM, Nicolas Anquetil <Nicolas.Anquetil(a)inria.fr>
wrote:
>
> As I remember it, it was a suggestion of Stephane and Marcus to isolate FAST from
FAMIX
>
> nicolas
>
>
> On 08/16/2013 03:42 PM, Tudor Girba wrote:
>
> Also, I do not quite understand the need for the FAMIX wrapper classes from
FAST-Model. For example, you have
> "FAMIXSourcedEntity subclass: #FASTBehaviouralEntity"
>
> Why was FAMIXBehaviouralEntity not enough?
>
> Doru
>
>
> --
> Nicolas Anquetil -- RMod research team (Inria)
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Moose-dev mailing list
> Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
>
>
>
> --
> www.tudorgirba.com
>
> "Every thing has its own flow"
> _______________________________________________
> Moose-dev mailing list
> Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
--
www.tudorgirba.com
"Every thing has its own flow"
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev