1 May
2016
1 May
'16
9:32 p.m.
It was more of a thought. Moose Core is essentially one package plus the
Fame dependency. What I do not like about this is that it does not have
a separate identity (MooseCore is just a technical name). Famix was
supposed to be the conglomerate of all meta-models, and I would more
like to see it somewhere in that direction. However, indeed, there
should be a separate entity, only it would be great if we would find a
name for it :).
For me
MooseCore
FamixEntity
Model
Group
Import
Save
Famix is another.
What is certainly a goal is to have a
ConfigurationOfMoose that only depends on other configurations (i.e., is a pure assembly).
yes
Cheers,
Doru
On May 1, 2016, at 7:22 PM, stepharo
<stepharo(a)free.fr> wrote:
--
www.tudorgirba.com
www.feenk.com
"Every thing should have the right to be different."
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)list.inf.unibe.ch
https://www.list.inf.unibe.ch/listinfo/moose-dev
Indeed, having a ConfigurationOfFamix would be
great, and in fact it was a goal for this release but nobody picked it up until now :). I
would not want to get a ConfigurationOfMooseCore if possible.
why?
Would you like to give it a first try?
Cheers,
Doru
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)list.inf.unibe.ch
https://www.list.inf.unibe.ch/listinfo/moose-dev What do you think about it?
> Cheers,
> Doru
>
>
> --
> www.tudorgirba.com
> www.feenk.com
>
> "Being happy is a matter of choice."
>
--
Cyril Ferlicot
http://www.synectique.eu
165 Avenue Bretagne
Lille 59000 France
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)list.inf.unibe.ch
https://www.list.inf.unibe.ch/listinfo/moose-dev
--
www.tudorgirba.com
www.feenk.com
"Some battles are better lost than fought."
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)list.inf.unibe.ch
https://www.list.inf.unibe.ch/listinfo/moose-dev