6:35 a.m.
Hi,
I would like to release Moose two weeks after Pharo 5 is released (probably next week).
After that, we will move the development to Pharo 6.
Cheers,
Doru
--
www.tudorgirba.com
www.feenk.com
"Being happy is a matter of choice."
6:43 p.m.
Le 30/04/2016 06:35, Tudor Girba a écrit :
Hi,
I would like to release Moose two weeks after Pharo 5 is released (probably next week).
After that, we will move the development to Pharo 6.
Hi Doru,
With the release of Moose 6, at Synectique we would like to improve the
configurations.
Currently we have tools that do not need any in-pharo interface but we
have to load a lot of stuff as Roassal or last version of glamour
because this is impossible to only get Famix.
We would like to be able to load only the core model of Moose with Moose
6. In order to do that we thought that it would be good to have a
ConfigurationOfMooseCore with only the packages needed by Famix and a
ConfigurationOfFamix that would allow us to load only the model of
Moose. With this changes we would be able to have much more modular
projects. It is currently impossible to have famix without Roassal for
example.
What do you think about it?
Cheers,
Doru
--
www.tudorgirba.com
www.feenk.com
"Being happy is a matter of choice."
--
Cyril Ferlicot
http://www.synectique.eu
165 Avenue Bretagne
Lille 59000 France
6:50 p.m.
Hi,
On Apr 30, 2016, at 6:43 PM, Cyril Ferlicot D.
<cyril.ferlicot(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Le 30/04/2016 06:35, Tudor Girba a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> I would like to release Moose two weeks after Pharo 5 is released (probably next
week). After that, we will move the development to Pharo 6.
>
Hi Doru,
With the release of Moose 6, at Synectique we would like to improve the
configurations.
Currently we have tools that do not need any in-pharo interface but we
have to load a lot of stuff as Roassal or last version of glamour
because this is impossible to only get Famix.
We would like to be able to load only the core model of Moose with Moose
6. In order to do that we thought that it would be good to have a
ConfigurationOfMooseCore with only the packages needed by Famix and a
ConfigurationOfFamix that would allow us to load only the model of
Moose. With this changes we would be able to have much more modular
projects. It is currently impossible to have famix without Roassal for
example.
Indeed, having a ConfigurationOfFamix would be great, and in fact it was a goal for this
release but nobody picked it up until now :). I would not want to get a
ConfigurationOfMooseCore if possible. Would you like to give it a first try?
Cheers,
Doru
What do you think about it?
> Cheers,
> Doru
>
>
> --
> www.tudorgirba.com
> www.feenk.com
>
> "Being happy is a matter of choice."
>
--
Cyril Ferlicot
http://www.synectique.eu
165 Avenue Bretagne
Lille 59000 France
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)list.inf.unibe.ch
https://www.list.inf.unibe.ch/listinfo/moose-dev
--
www.tudorgirba.com
www.feenk.com
"Some battles are better lost than fought."
6:59 p.m.
Le 30/04/2016 18:50, Tudor Girba a écrit :
Hi,
Indeed, having a ConfigurationOfFamix would be great, and in fact it was a goal for this
release but nobody picked it up until now :). I would not want to get a
ConfigurationOfMooseCore if possible. Would you like to give it a first try?
I did not knew enough the state of moose/famix to know if we needed a
MooseCore but if you think we do not need it it's fine.
I do not know when we will have the time to work on it at Synectique. We
can discuss it Monday. We will try to find the time to do it since we
lose a lot of time because of the huge configurations we have now.
Cheers,
Doru
--
Cyril Ferlicot
http://www.synectique.eu
165 Avenue Bretagne
Lille 59000 France
7:22 p.m.
Indeed, having a ConfigurationOfFamix would be great, and in fact it
was a goal for this release but nobody picked it up until now :). I would not want to get
a ConfigurationOfMooseCore if possible.
why?
Would you like to give it a first try?
Cheers,
Doru
> What do you think about it?
>
>> Cheers,
>> Doru
>>
>>
>> --
>> www.tudorgirba.com
>> www.feenk.com
>>
>> "Being happy is a matter of choice."
>>
>
> --
> Cyril Ferlicot
>
> http://www.synectique.eu
>
> 165 Avenue Bretagne
> Lille 59000 France
>
> _______________________________________________
> Moose-dev mailing list
> Moose-dev(a)list.inf.unibe.ch
> https://www.list.inf.unibe.ch/listinfo/moose-dev
--
www.tudorgirba.com
www.feenk.com
"Some battles are better lost than fought."
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)list.inf.unibe.ch
https://www.list.inf.unibe.ch/listinfo/moose-dev
9:17 p.m.
It was more of a thought. Moose Core is essentially one package plus the Fame dependency.
What I do not like about this is that it does not have a separate identity (MooseCore is
just a technical name). Famix was supposed to be the conglomerate of all meta-models, and
I would more like to see it somewhere in that direction. However, indeed, there should be
a separate entity, only it would be great if we would find a name for it :).
What is certainly a goal is to have a ConfigurationOfMoose that only depends on other
configurations (i.e., is a pure assembly).
Cheers,
Doru
On May 1, 2016, at 7:22 PM, stepharo <stepharo(a)free.fr> wrote:
>
> Indeed, having a ConfigurationOfFamix would be great, and in fact it was a goal for
this release but nobody picked it up until now :). I would not want to get a
ConfigurationOfMooseCore if possible.
why?
> Would you like to give it a first try?
>
> Cheers,
> Doru
>
>
>> What do you think about it?
>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Doru
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> www.tudorgirba.com
>>> www.feenk.com
>>>
>>> "Being happy is a matter of choice."
>>>
>>
>> --
>> Cyril Ferlicot
>>
>> http://www.synectique.eu
>>
>> 165 Avenue Bretagne
>> Lille 59000 France
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Moose-dev mailing list
>> Moose-dev(a)list.inf.unibe.ch
>> https://www.list.inf.unibe.ch/listinfo/moose-dev
> --
> www.tudorgirba.com
> www.feenk.com
>
> "Some battles are better lost than fought."
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Moose-dev mailing list
> Moose-dev(a)list.inf.unibe.ch
> https://www.list.inf.unibe.ch/listinfo/moose-dev
>
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)list.inf.unibe.ch
https://www.list.inf.unibe.ch/listinfo/moose-dev
--
www.tudorgirba.com
www.feenk.com
"Every thing should have the right to be different."
9:32 p.m.
It was more of a thought. Moose Core is essentially one package plus the
Fame dependency. What I do not like about this is that it does not have
a separate identity (MooseCore is just a technical name). Famix was
supposed to be the conglomerate of all meta-models, and I would more
like to see it somewhere in that direction. However, indeed, there
should be a separate entity, only it would be great if we would find a
name for it :).
For me
MooseCore
FamixEntity
Model
Group
Import
Save
Famix is another.
What is certainly a goal is to have a ConfigurationOfMoose that only
depends on other configurations (i.e., is a pure assembly).
yes
Cheers,
Doru
> On May 1, 2016, at 7:22 PM, stepharo <stepharo(a)free.fr> wrote:
>
>> Indeed, having a ConfigurationOfFamix would be great, and in fact it was a goal
for this release but nobody picked it up until now :). I would not want to get a
ConfigurationOfMooseCore if possible.
> why?
>
>> Would you like to give it a first try?
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Doru
>>
>>
>>> What do you think about it?
>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> Doru
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> www.tudorgirba.com
>>>> www.feenk.com
>>>>
>>>> "Being happy is a matter of choice."
>>>>
>>> --
>>> Cyril Ferlicot
>>>
>>> http://www.synectique.eu
>>>
>>> 165 Avenue Bretagne
>>> Lille 59000 France
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Moose-dev mailing list
>>> Moose-dev(a)list.inf.unibe.ch
>>> https://www.list.inf.unibe.ch/listinfo/moose-dev
>> --
>> www.tudorgirba.com
>> www.feenk.com
>>
>> "Some battles are better lost than fought."
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Moose-dev mailing list
>> Moose-dev(a)list.inf.unibe.ch
>> https://www.list.inf.unibe.ch/listinfo/moose-dev
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Moose-dev mailing list
> Moose-dev(a)list.inf.unibe.ch
> https://www.list.inf.unibe.ch/listinfo/moose-dev
--
www.tudorgirba.com
www.feenk.com
"Every thing should have the right to be different."
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)list.inf.unibe.ch
https://www.list.inf.unibe.ch/listinfo/moose-dev
9:53 p.m.
Hi,
On May 1, 2016, at 9:32 PM, stepharo <stepharo(a)free.fr> wrote:
It was more of a thought. Moose Core is essentially one package plus the Fame dependency.
What I do not like about this is that it does not have a separate identity (MooseCore is
just a technical name). Famix was supposed to be the conglomerate of all meta-models, and
I would more like to see it somewhere in that direction. However, indeed, there should be
a separate entity, only it would be great if we would find a name for it :).
For me
MooseCore
FamixEntity
MooseEntity
Model
Group
Import
The Smalltalk import should go closer to Famix, not to the generic Moose.
The MSE import is dealt with by Fame.
Save
Famix is another.
Yes, but I just would prefer to find a name for MooseCore, because this is not what the
essence of Moose is. It’s only the modeling part, and this is no longer the main part.
Cheers,
Doru
> What is certainly a goal is to have a ConfigurationOfMoose that
only depends on other configurations (i.e., is a pure assembly).
yes
>
> Cheers,
> Doru
>
>
>> On May 1, 2016, at 7:22 PM, stepharo <stepharo(a)free.fr> wrote:
>>
>>> Indeed, having a ConfigurationOfFamix would be great, and in fact it was a
goal for this release but nobody picked it up until now :). I would not want to get a
ConfigurationOfMooseCore if possible.
>> why?
>>
>>> Would you like to give it a first try?
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Doru
>>>
>>>
>>>> What do you think about it?
>>>>
>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>> Doru
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> www.tudorgirba.com
>>>>> www.feenk.com
>>>>>
>>>>> "Being happy is a matter of choice."
>>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Cyril Ferlicot
>>>>
>>>> http://www.synectique.eu
>>>>
>>>> 165 Avenue Bretagne
>>>> Lille 59000 France
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Moose-dev mailing list
>>>> Moose-dev(a)list.inf.unibe.ch
>>>> https://www.list.inf.unibe.ch/listinfo/moose-dev
>>> --
>>> www.tudorgirba.com
>>> www.feenk.com
>>>
>>> "Some battles are better lost than fought."
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Moose-dev mailing list
>>> Moose-dev(a)list.inf.unibe.ch
>>> https://www.list.inf.unibe.ch/listinfo/moose-dev
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Moose-dev mailing list
>> Moose-dev(a)list.inf.unibe.ch
>> https://www.list.inf.unibe.ch/listinfo/moose-dev
> --
> www.tudorgirba.com
> www.feenk.com
>
> "Every thing should have the right to be different."
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Moose-dev mailing list
> Moose-dev(a)list.inf.unibe.ch
> https://www.list.inf.unibe.ch/listinfo/moose-dev
>
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)list.inf.unibe.ch
https://www.list.inf.unibe.ch/listinfo/moose-dev
--
www.tudorgirba.com
www.feenk.com
"If you can't say why something is relevant,
it probably isn't."
11:21 p.m.
Yes, I would also like separate configurations, or at least groups…
right now I do this monstrosity…
baseline: spec
<baseline>
spec
for: #common
do: [
spec
project: 'Fame'
with: [ spec
className: #ConfigurationOfFame;
versionString: #development;
repository: 'http://www.smalltalkhub.com/mc/Moose/Fame/main' ];
package: 'CollectionExtensions'
with: [ spec repository: '
http://www.smalltalkhub.com/mc/Moose/CollectionExtensions/main' ];
package: 'Moose-Core'
with: [ spec
repository: 'http://www.smalltalkhub.com/mc/Moose/Moose/main';
requires: #('Fame' 'Moose-Query' 'CollectionExtensions') ];
package: 'Famix-Core'
with: [ spec
repository: 'http://www.smalltalkhub.com/mc/Moose/Moose/main';
requires: #('Moose-Core') ];
package: 'Moose-Query'
with: [ spec repository: 'http://www.smalltalkhub.com/mc/Moose/Moose/main'
];
package: 'Famix-Extensions'
with: [ spec
repository: 'http://www.smalltalkhub.com/mc/Moose/Moose/main';
requires: #('Famix-Core') ];
package: 'Famix-Implementation'
with: [ spec
repository: 'http://www.smalltalkhub.com/mc/Moose/Moose/main';
requires: #('Famix-Core') ].
spec group: 'famix' with: #('Famix-Core' 'Famix-Extensions'
'Famix-Implementation').
On Sun, May 1, 2016 at 9:53 PM, Tudor Girba <tudor(a)tudorgirba.com> wrote:
Hi,
> On May 1, 2016, at 9:32 PM, stepharo <stepharo(a)free.fr> wrote:
>
> It was more of a thought. Moose Core is essentially one package plus the
Fame dependency. What I do not like about this is that it does not have a
separate identity (MooseCore is just a technical name). Famix was supposed
to be the conglomerate of all meta-models, and I would more like to see it
somewhere in that direction. However, indeed, there should be a separate
entity, only it would be great if we would find a name for it :).
>
>
> For me
> MooseCore
> FamixEntity
MooseEntity
> Model
> Group
> Import
The Smalltalk import should go closer to Famix, not to the generic Moose.
The MSE import is dealt with by Fame.
> Save
>
> Famix is another.
Yes, but I just would prefer to find a name for MooseCore, because this is
not what the essence of Moose is. It’s only the modeling part, and this is
no longer the main part.
Cheers,
Doru
>> What is certainly a goal is to have a ConfigurationOfMoose that only
depends on other configurations (i.e., is a pure assembly).
> yes
>
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Doru
>>
>>
>>> On May 1, 2016, at 7:22 PM, stepharo <stepharo(a)free.fr> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Indeed, having a ConfigurationOfFamix would be great, and in fact it
was a goal for this release but nobody picked it up until now :). I would
not want to get a ConfigurationOfMooseCore if possible.
>>> why?
>>>
>>>> Would you like to give it a first try?
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> Doru
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> What do you think about it?
>>>>>
>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>> Doru
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> www.tudorgirba.com
>>>>>> www.feenk.com
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "Being happy is a matter of choice."
>>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Cyril Ferlicot
>>>>>
>>>>> http://www.synectique.eu
>>>>>
>>>>> 165 Avenue Bretagne
>>>>> Lille 59000 France
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Moose-dev mailing list
>>>>> Moose-dev(a)list.inf.unibe.ch
>>>>> https://www.list.inf.unibe.ch/listinfo/moose-dev
>>>> --
>>>> www.tudorgirba.com
>>>> www.feenk.com
>>>>
>>>> "Some battles are better lost than fought."
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Moose-dev mailing list
>>>> Moose-dev(a)list.inf.unibe.ch
>>>> https://www.list.inf.unibe.ch/listinfo/moose-dev
>>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Moose-dev mailing list
>>> Moose-dev(a)list.inf.unibe.ch
>>> https://www.list.inf.unibe.ch/listinfo/moose-dev
>> --
>> www.tudorgirba.com
>> www.feenk.com
>>
>> "Every thing should have the right to be different."
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Moose-dev mailing list
>> Moose-dev(a)list.inf.unibe.ch
>> https://www.list.inf.unibe.ch/listinfo/moose-dev
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Moose-dev mailing list
> Moose-dev(a)list.inf.unibe.ch
> https://www.list.inf.unibe.ch/listinfo/moose-dev
--
www.tudorgirba.com
www.feenk.com
"If you can't say why something is relevant,
it probably isn't."
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)list.inf.unibe.ch
https://www.list.inf.unibe.ch/listinfo/moose-dev
7:23 a.m.
Good starting point :)
Le 1/5/16 à 23:21, Peter Uhnák a écrit :
Yes, I would also like separate configurations, or at least groups…
right now I do this monstrosity…
baseline: spec
<baseline>
spec
for: #common
do: [
spec
project: 'Fame'
with: [ spec
className: #ConfigurationOfFame;
versionString: #development;
repository: 'http://www.smalltalkhub.com/mc/Moose/Fame/main' ];
package: 'CollectionExtensions'
with: [ spec repository:
'http://www.smalltalkhub.com/mc/Moose/CollectionExtensions/main' ];
package: 'Moose-Core'
with: [ spec
repository: 'http://www.smalltalkhub.com/mc/Moose/Moose/main';
requires: #('Fame' 'Moose-Query' 'CollectionExtensions') ];
package: 'Famix-Core'
with: [ spec
repository: 'http://www.smalltalkhub.com/mc/Moose/Moose/main';
requires: #('Moose-Core') ];
package: 'Moose-Query'
with: [ spec repository:
'http://www.smalltalkhub.com/mc/Moose/Moose/main' ];
package: 'Famix-Extensions'
with: [ spec
repository: 'http://www.smalltalkhub.com/mc/Moose/Moose/main';
requires: #('Famix-Core') ];
package: 'Famix-Implementation'
with: [ spec
repository: 'http://www.smalltalkhub.com/mc/Moose/Moose/main';
requires: #('Famix-Core') ].
spec group: 'famix' with: #('Famix-Core' 'Famix-Extensions'
'Famix-Implementation').
On Sun, May 1, 2016 at 9:53 PM, Tudor Girba <tudor(a)tudorgirba.com
<mailto:tudor@tudorgirba.com>> wrote:
Hi,
> On May 1, 2016, at 9:32 PM, stepharo <stepharo(a)free.fr
<mailto:stepharo@free.fr>> wrote:
>
> It was more of a thought. Moose Core is essentially one package
plus the Fame dependency. What I do not like about this is that it
does not have a separate identity (MooseCore is just a technical
name). Famix was supposed to be the conglomerate of all
meta-models, and I would more like to see it somewhere in that
direction. However, indeed, there should be a separate entity,
only it would be great if we would find a name for it :).
>
>
> For me
> MooseCore
> FamixEntity
MooseEntity
> Model
> Group
> Import
The Smalltalk import should go closer to Famix, not to the generic
Moose.
The MSE import is dealt with by Fame.
> Save
>
> Famix is another.
Yes, but I just would prefer to find a name for MooseCore, because
this is not what the essence of Moose is. It’s only the modeling
part, and this is no longer the main part.
Cheers,
Doru
>> What is certainly a goal is to have a ConfigurationOfMoose that
only depends on other configurations (i.e., is a pure assembly).
> yes
>
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Doru
>>
>>
>>> On May 1, 2016, at 7:22 PM, stepharo <stepharo(a)free.fr
<mailto:stepharo@free.fr>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Indeed, having a ConfigurationOfFamix would be great, and in
fact it was a goal for this release but nobody picked it up until
now :). I would not want to get a ConfigurationOfMooseCore if
possible.
>>> why?
>>>
>>>> Would you like to give it a first try?
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> Doru
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> What do you think about it?
>>>>>
>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>> Doru
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> www.tudorgirba.com <http://www.tudorgirba.com>
>>>>>> www.feenk.com <http://www.feenk.com>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "Being happy is a matter of choice."
>>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Cyril Ferlicot
>>>>>
>>>>> http://www.synectique.eu
>>>>>
>>>>> 165 Avenue Bretagne
>>>>> Lille 59000 France
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Moose-dev mailing list
>>>>> Moose-dev(a)list.inf.unibe.ch
<mailto:Moose-dev@list.inf.unibe.ch>
>>>>> https://www.list.inf.unibe.ch/listinfo/moose-dev
>>>> --
>>>> www.tudorgirba.com <http://www.tudorgirba.com>
>>>> www.feenk.com <http://www.feenk.com>
>>>>
>>>> "Some battles are better lost than fought."
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Moose-dev mailing list
>>>> Moose-dev(a)list.inf.unibe.ch
<mailto:Moose-dev@list.inf.unibe.ch>
>>>> https://www.list.inf.unibe.ch/listinfo/moose-dev
>>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Moose-dev mailing list
>>> Moose-dev(a)list.inf.unibe.ch <mailto:Moose-dev@list.inf.unibe.ch>
>>> https://www.list.inf.unibe.ch/listinfo/moose-dev
>> --
>> www.tudorgirba.com <http://www.tudorgirba.com>
>> www.feenk.com <http://www.feenk.com>
>>
>> "Every thing should have the right to be different."
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Moose-dev mailing list
>> Moose-dev(a)list.inf.unibe.ch <mailto:Moose-dev@list.inf.unibe.ch>
>> https://www.list.inf.unibe.ch/listinfo/moose-dev
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Moose-dev mailing list
> Moose-dev(a)list.inf.unibe.ch <mailto:Moose-dev@list.inf.unibe.ch>
> https://www.list.inf.unibe.ch/listinfo/moose-dev
--
www.tudorgirba.com <http://www.tudorgirba.com>
www.feenk.com <http://www.feenk.com>
"If you can't say why something is relevant,
it probably isn't."
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)list.inf.unibe.ch <mailto:Moose-dev@list.inf.unibe.ch>
https://www.list.inf.unibe.ch/listinfo/moose-dev
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)list.inf.unibe.ch
https://www.list.inf.unibe.ch/listinfo/moose-dev
7:53 a.m.
ATM that works better as a group than a separate configuration.
It is unlikely to change independently from changes to Moose,
That is, untill we start reimplementing Famix
Stephan
Verstuurd vanaf mijn iPad
Op 1 mei 2016 om 23:21 heeft Peter Uhnák <i.uhnak(a)gmail.com>
het volgende geschreven:
Yes, I would also like separate configurations, or at least groups…
right now I do this monstrosity…
baseline: spec
<baseline>
spec
for: #common
do: [
spec
project: 'Fame'
with: [ spec
className: #ConfigurationOfFame;
versionString: #development;
repository: 'http://www.smalltalkhub.com/mc/Moose/Fame/main' ];
package: 'CollectionExtensions'
with: [ spec repository:
'http://www.smalltalkhub.com/mc/Moose/CollectionExtensions/main' ];
package: 'Moose-Core'
with: [ spec
repository: 'http://www.smalltalkhub.com/mc/Moose/Moose/main';
requires: #('Fame' 'Moose-Query' 'CollectionExtensions')
];
package: 'Famix-Core'
with: [ spec
repository: 'http://www.smalltalkhub.com/mc/Moose/Moose/main';
requires: #('Moose-Core') ];
package: 'Moose-Query'
with: [ spec repository: 'http://www.smalltalkhub.com/mc/Moose/Moose/main'
];
package: 'Famix-Extensions'
with: [ spec
repository: 'http://www.smalltalkhub.com/mc/Moose/Moose/main';
requires: #('Famix-Core') ];
package: 'Famix-Implementation'
with: [ spec
repository: 'http://www.smalltalkhub.com/mc/Moose/Moose/main';
requires: #('Famix-Core') ].
spec group: 'famix' with: #('Famix-Core' 'Famix-Extensions'
'Famix-Implementation').
> On Sun, May 1, 2016 at 9:53 PM, Tudor Girba <tudor(a)tudorgirba.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > On May 1, 2016, at 9:32 PM, stepharo <stepharo(a)free.fr> wrote:
> >
> > It was more of a thought. Moose Core is essentially one package plus the Fame
dependency. What I do not like about this is that it does not have a separate identity
(MooseCore is just a technical name). Famix was supposed to be the conglomerate of all
meta-models, and I would more like to see it somewhere in that direction. However, indeed,
there should be a separate entity, only it would be great if we would find a name for it
:).
> >
> >
> > For me
> > MooseCore
> > FamixEntity
>
> MooseEntity
>
> > Model
> > Group
> > Import
>
> The Smalltalk import should go closer to Famix, not to the generic Moose.
>
> The MSE import is dealt with by Fame.
>
> > Save
> >
>
> > Famix is another.
>
> Yes, but I just would prefer to find a name for MooseCore, because this is not what
the essence of Moose is. It’s only the modeling part, and this is no longer the main
part.
>
> Cheers,
> Doru
>
> >> What is certainly a goal is to have a ConfigurationOfMoose that only depends
on other configurations (i.e., is a pure assembly).
> > yes
> >
> >>
> >> Cheers,
> >> Doru
> >>
> >>
> >>> On May 1, 2016, at 7:22 PM, stepharo <stepharo(a)free.fr> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Indeed, having a ConfigurationOfFamix would be great, and in fact it
was a goal for this release but nobody picked it up until now :). I would not want to get
a ConfigurationOfMooseCore if possible.
> >>> why?
> >>>
> >>>> Would you like to give it a first try?
> >>>>
> >>>> Cheers,
> >>>> Doru
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>> What do you think about it?
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> Cheers,
> >>>>>> Doru
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> --
> >>>>>> www.tudorgirba.com
> >>>>>> www.feenk.com
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> "Being happy is a matter of choice."
> >>>>>>
> >>>>> --
> >>>>> Cyril Ferlicot
> >>>>>
> >>>>> http://www.synectique.eu
> >>>>>
> >>>>> 165 Avenue Bretagne
> >>>>> Lille 59000 France
> >>>>>
> >>>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>>> Moose-dev mailing list
> >>>>> Moose-dev(a)list.inf.unibe.ch
> >>>>> https://www.list.inf.unibe.ch/listinfo/moose-dev
> >>>> --
> >>>> www.tudorgirba.com
> >>>> www.feenk.com
> >>>>
> >>>> "Some battles are better lost than fought."
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>> Moose-dev mailing list
> >>>> Moose-dev(a)list.inf.unibe.ch
> >>>> https://www.list.inf.unibe.ch/listinfo/moose-dev
> >>>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> Moose-dev mailing list
> >>> Moose-dev(a)list.inf.unibe.ch
> >>> https://www.list.inf.unibe.ch/listinfo/moose-dev
> >> --
> >> www.tudorgirba.com
> >> www.feenk.com
> >>
> >> "Every thing should have the right to be different."
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Moose-dev mailing list
> >> Moose-dev(a)list.inf.unibe.ch
> >> https://www.list.inf.unibe.ch/listinfo/moose-dev
> >>
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Moose-dev mailing list
> > Moose-dev(a)list.inf.unibe.ch
> > https://www.list.inf.unibe.ch/listinfo/moose-dev
>
> --
> www.tudorgirba.com
> www.feenk.com
>
> "If you can't say why something is relevant,
> it probably isn't."
>
> _______________________________________________
> Moose-dev mailing list
> Moose-dev(a)list.inf.unibe.ch
> https://www.list.inf.unibe.ch/listinfo/moose-dev
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)list.inf.unibe.ch
https://www.list.inf.unibe.ch/listinfo/moose-dev
2770
days inactive
2772
days old
10 comments
5 participants
participants (5)
-
Cyril Ferlicot D. -
Peter Uhnák -
Stephan Eggermont -
stepharo -
Tudor Girba