Hi,
What if we transform icon pack into iconic font, of cource if such technic
is supported by pharo? In this case the color of icons could be customised
by themes.
Cheers,
Alex
On Tue, Sep 9, 2014 at 8:09 AM, phil(a)highoctane.be <phil(a)highoctane.be
Le 9 sept. 2014 00:21, "Andrei Chis" <chisvasileandrei(a)gmail.com> a
écrit
:
On Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 11:46 PM, phil(a)highoctane.be <phil(a)highoctane.be>
wrote:
> Le 8 sept. 2014 23:28, "Andrei
Chis" <chisvasileandrei(a)gmail.com> a
écrit :
>
> > Hi Phil,
>
> > Thanks for your feedback :)
> > Workspace has a large API. At the moment in the Playground we only
implemented the minimum.
>
> > On Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 9:36 AM, phil(a)highoctane.be <
phil(a)highoctane.be> wrote:
> >
> >> When one is in Monticello (Pharo 3.0) and asks for "View Past
Comments" on a package, there is a #mnu on GTPlayground
class>>openLabel:
> >
> >> Not only there but the FileList (aka FileBrowser) has that
"Workspace with contents" command which is broken in the same way.
> >
> >> There is for sure an interesting equivalent in GTPlayground. Why not
name it as the Workspace thing?
> >
> >> What is asked:
> >
> >> edit:
aText label: labelString accept: anAction
> >> "Open an editor on the given string/text"
> >
> >>
^(Smalltalk tools workspace openLabel: labelString)
> >> acceptContents: aText;
> >> acceptAction: anAction;
> >> yourself.
> >
> >> What
GTPlayground implements:
> >
> >>
openContents:
> >> openContents:label:
> >
> >> We can
deal with openLabel: and acceptContents but an acceptAction
equivalent is not to be
found.
> >
> >> Also, after looking around (see changeset in attachment), it is hard
to do the acceptContents: as we get a self new openOn: page which isn't
returning anything I can work with to chain acceptContents: to.
> >
> >> What to do there?
>
>
> > For the moment in the implementation of acceptContents: and
acceptAction: from GLMSystemWindow I delegate to the model, which is
GTPlayground.
> > acceptContents: can be easily
implemented this way but acceptAction:
it's a little more problematic. I need
to look more at how it behaves in
Workspace but from what I've see we can get the same behaviour if when
calling acceptAction: I set the given action to be executed on cmd+s
>
> >
> >
> >> Also, there is a super annoying
thing in the GTPlayground, namely
the disappearance of the top right menu, with all
the interesting options
that are in there and that I do use all the time (like open/save, previous
contents, ...). What's the point of a Playground if I can't save my plays?
I think I am missing something here.
>
>
> > This
features are just not implemented yet.
> > We were thinking of a more general and automatic way of saving the
content of the workspace but did't manage to implemented yet.
> > For the previous content you have access
to the entire history of the
workspace. Do you find it intuitive?
> > What other actions from the top down
menu are missing for you?
>
>
> >
> >
> >> I now have to go back to the old
Workspace for the default.
> >
> >> It may
be good to have a way to have the playground as a specific
menu entry.
> >
> >> I've started using the ZnWorkspace and as it extends the
Workspace,
its features aren't picked up in GTPlayground of course.
> >> Now, it may be great to include
those Pastebin style things into
GTPlayground so that we can all play together from
little urls from Twitter
posts.
>
>
> > I'll
have a look at ZnWorkspace. Did't use it yet :)
>
> > I also integrated your changeset.
> > If want to fix more bugs in the future feel free to commit directly
in
the Moose repository.
I can add you as a contributor if you're not one
already.
I am not. Add me please.
Done :)
Sweet.
I would be pleased to be of help with GToolkit.
Any help is welcomed :)
> BTW is there a version which works well
with the dark theme? As you can
see from the screenshot things are hard to read.
Uko maybe has something?
Not that I know of. The main problem is that Moose is still in Pharo 3
where the
black theme is still a "hack", so not every setting can be
properly customised. But the move to Phato 4 should happen soon, and then
things should improve.
Mmh. I am using 3.0 for customer projects. So I'll have a look into that
as I want to use the GT things to see how well the playground can help with
exploration of options.
Aha. So you have a different use case than us. Let me know if you run into
any problem with Glamour/GT
The icons should be aware of the theme.
Maybe we need a new set of icons based on a different color set?
You can find the current ones here:
Andrei
> Also I am using the DawnTheme here.
> >> >>
_______________________________________________
> >> >> Moose-dev mailing list
> >> >> Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
> >> >>
> >> > _______________________________________________
> >> > Moose-dev mailing list
> >> > Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
> >> >
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Moose-dev mailing list
> >> Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
> >>
> > _______________________________________________
> > Moose-dev mailing list
> > Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Moose-dev mailing list
> Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
>
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch