25 Nov
2008
25 Nov
'08
2:41 p.m.
So isAbstract et isPublic should be in core from my
point of view.
I understood this. But Famix-Java should provide a different
implementation of isPublic and isAbstract.
I agree with you, these methods should be in the core.
Cheers,
Alexandre
On Nov 25, 2008, at 11:35 AM, Alexandre Bergel wrote:
--
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
But isPublic and isAbstract in Famix and
Famix-Java (what is that by
the way?) should not be the same.
isPublic is inferred from incoming calls in Smalltalk, whereas in
Java it is specified from the programmer.
Alexandre
On 25 Nov 2008, at 06:55, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Hi doru
right now isAbstract and isPublic are in the Famix-Smalltalk and I
think that they should be in core.
After we could have isPackageProtected for Java in Famix-Java.
Stef
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
--
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev