It was more of a thought. Moose Core is essentially one package plus the Fame dependency. What I do not like about this is that it does not have a separate identity (MooseCore is just a technical name). Famix was supposed to be the conglomerate of all meta-models, and I would more like to see it somewhere in that direction. However, indeed, there should be a separate entity, only it would be great if we would find a name for it :).
What is certainly a goal is to have a ConfigurationOfMoose that only depends on other configurations (i.e., is a pure assembly).
Cheers, Doru
On May 1, 2016, at 7:22 PM, stepharo stepharo@free.fr wrote:
Indeed, having a ConfigurationOfFamix would be great, and in fact it was a goal for this release but nobody picked it up until now :). I would not want to get a ConfigurationOfMooseCore if possible.
why?
Would you like to give it a first try?
Cheers, Doru
What do you think about it?
Cheers, Doru
-- www.tudorgirba.com www.feenk.com
"Being happy is a matter of choice."
-- Cyril Ferlicot
165 Avenue Bretagne Lille 59000 France
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@list.inf.unibe.ch https://www.list.inf.unibe.ch/listinfo/moose-dev
-- www.tudorgirba.com www.feenk.com
"Some battles are better lost than fought."
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@list.inf.unibe.ch https://www.list.inf.unibe.ch/listinfo/moose-dev
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@list.inf.unibe.ch https://www.list.inf.unibe.ch/listinfo/moose-dev
-- www.tudorgirba.com www.feenk.com
"Every thing should have the right to be different."