It was more of a thought. Moose Core is essentially one package plus the Fame dependency.
What I do not like about this is that it does not have a separate identity (MooseCore is
just a technical name). Famix was supposed to be the conglomerate of all meta-models, and
I would more like to see it somewhere in that direction. However, indeed, there should be
a separate entity, only it would be great if we would find a name for it :).
What is certainly a goal is to have a ConfigurationOfMoose that only depends on other
configurations (i.e., is a pure assembly).
Cheers,
Doru
On May 1, 2016, at 7:22 PM, stepharo
<stepharo(a)free.fr> wrote:
Indeed, having a ConfigurationOfFamix would be great, and in fact it was a goal for this
release but nobody picked it up until now :). I would not want to get a
ConfigurationOfMooseCore if possible.
why?
Would you like to give it a first try?
Cheers,
Doru
What do you think about it?
Cheers,
Doru
--
www.tudorgirba.com
www.feenk.com
"Being happy is a matter of choice."
--
Cyril Ferlicot
http://www.synectique.eu
165 Avenue Bretagne
Lille 59000 France
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)list.inf.unibe.ch
https://www.list.inf.unibe.ch/listinfo/moose-dev --
www.tudorgirba.com
www.feenk.com
"Some battles are better lost than fought."
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)list.inf.unibe.ch
https://www.list.inf.unibe.ch/listinfo/moose-dev
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)list.inf.unibe.ch
https://www.list.inf.unibe.ch/listinfo/moose-dev
--
www.tudorgirba.com
www.feenk.com
"Every thing should have the right to be different."