27 Nov
2013
27 Nov
'13
2:37 p.m.
Indeed. Thanks for reporting it.
Just a note: If you want to report a problem related to Roassal, you can
just build anonymous graphs using numbers. For example, here is a more
complicated graph:
view := ROMondrianViewBuilder new.
view nodes: (1 to: 5) forEach: [ :each |
view nodes: ((each * 10) to: (each * 20)).
view edgesFrom: [ :x |
((x - (each * 10)) // 2) + ((each * 10)) ].
view treeLayout ].
view gridLayout.
view open
Doru
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 2:42 PM, Goubier Thierry <thierry.goubier(a)cea.fr>wrote;wrote:
Hi all,
it seems I hit this bug... Trying to reproduce my thing with an arbitrary
set, but, yes, nesting made it really strange (and the regular tree layout
worked once nested).
Thierry
Le 27/11/2013 14:25, moose-technology(a)googlecode.com a écrit :
--
www.tudorgirba.com
"Every thing has its own flow"
Comment #3 on issue 1017 by tu...(a)tudorgirba.com:
RadialTreeLayout does
not work properly
http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=1017
But, here is something even more fishy. When nested,
RadialNarrowTreeLayout works in a funny way:
view := ROMondrianViewBuilder new.
view node: #a forIt: [
view nodes: (1 to: 99).
view edgesFrom: [ :x | x // 10 ].
view radialNarrowTreeLayout ].
view open
At the same time, the ragular TreeLayout works fine:
view := ROMondrianViewBuilder new.
view node: #a forIt: [
view nodes: (1 to: 99).
view edgesFrom: [ :x | x // 10 ].
view treeLayout ].
view open
--
Thierry Goubier
CEA list
Laboratoire des Fondations des Systèmes Temps Réel Embarqués
91191 Gif sur Yvette Cedex
France
Phone/Fax: +33 (0) 1 69 08 32 92 / 83 95
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev