Indeed. Thanks for reporting it.
Just a note: If you want to report a problem related to Roassal, you can just build anonymous graphs using numbers. For example, here is a more complicated graph: view := ROMondrianViewBuilder new. view nodes: (1 to: 5) forEach: [ :each | view nodes: ((each * 10) to: (each * 20)). view edgesFrom: [ :x | ((x - (each * 10)) // 2) + ((each * 10)) ]. view treeLayout ]. view gridLayout. view open
Doru
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 2:42 PM, Goubier Thierry thierry.goubier@cea.frwrote:
Hi all,
it seems I hit this bug... Trying to reproduce my thing with an arbitrary set, but, yes, nesting made it really strange (and the regular tree layout worked once nested).
Thierry
Le 27/11/2013 14:25, moose-technology@googlecode.com a écrit :
Comment #3 on issue 1017 by tu...@tudorgirba.com: RadialTreeLayout does not work properly http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=1017
But, here is something even more fishy. When nested, RadialNarrowTreeLayout works in a funny way:
view := ROMondrianViewBuilder new. view node: #a forIt: [ view nodes: (1 to: 99). view edgesFrom: [ :x | x // 10 ]. view radialNarrowTreeLayout ]. view open
At the same time, the ragular TreeLayout works fine: view := ROMondrianViewBuilder new. view node: #a forIt: [ view nodes: (1 to: 99). view edgesFrom: [ :x | x // 10 ]. view treeLayout ]. view open
-- Thierry Goubier CEA list Laboratoire des Fondations des Systèmes Temps Réel Embarqués 91191 Gif sur Yvette Cedex France Phone/Fax: +33 (0) 1 69 08 32 92 / 83 95
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev