Indeed. Thanks for reporting it.

Just a note: If you want to report a problem related to Roassal, you can just build anonymous graphs using numbers. For example, here is a more complicated graph:
view := ROMondrianViewBuilder new.
view nodes: (1 to: 5) forEach: [ :each |
view nodes: ((each * 10) to: (each * 20)).
view edgesFrom: [ :x | 
((x - (each * 10)) // 2) + ((each * 10)) ].
view treeLayout ].
view gridLayout.
view open

Doru




On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 2:42 PM, Goubier Thierry <thierry.goubier@cea.fr> wrote:
Hi all,

it seems I hit this bug... Trying to reproduce my thing with an arbitrary set, but, yes, nesting made it really strange (and the regular tree layout worked once nested).

Thierry

Le 27/11/2013 14:25, moose-technology@googlecode.com a écrit :


Comment #3 on issue 1017 by tu...@tudorgirba.com: RadialTreeLayout does
not work properly
http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=1017

But, here is something even more fishy. When nested,
RadialNarrowTreeLayout works in a funny way:

view := ROMondrianViewBuilder new.
view node: #a forIt: [
     view nodes: (1 to: 99).
     view edgesFrom: [ :x | x // 10 ].
     view radialNarrowTreeLayout ].
view open

At the same time, the ragular TreeLayout works fine:
view := ROMondrianViewBuilder new.
view node: #a forIt: [
     view nodes: (1 to: 99).
     view edgesFrom: [ :x | x // 10 ].
     view treeLayout ].
view open


--
Thierry Goubier
CEA list
Laboratoire des Fondations des Systèmes Temps Réel Embarqués
91191 Gif sur Yvette Cedex
France
Phone/Fax: +33 (0) 1 69 08 32 92 / 83 95

_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev



--
www.tudorgirba.com

"Every thing has its own flow"