Yes, that's enough. But, if you created these classes from scratch, you should also ensure that you refresh the meta-model :).
You can do it from the menu of the Meta Browser, or you can just execute: MooseModel resetMeta
Doru
On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 3:58 PM, Alexandre Bergel alexandre.bergel@me.com wrote:
Hi!
I am building a small meta-models for c++ analysis. I have created a class called PCPPFunction, a subclass of MooseEntity. (I know there is a FAMIXFunction, but the PCPPFunction is radically different from FAMIXFunction because if contains many information about dynamic analysis).
When I visualize instance of PCPPFunction, and I click on one, I get an error:
I guess I did not properly define the metamodel behind. But I do not see what is wrong. Here are the definitions:
PCPPObject class>>annotation <MSEClass: #PCPPObject super: #MooseEntity> <package: #ProfilerCPP> ^ self
PCPPFunction class>>annotation <MSEClass: #PCPPFunction super: #PCPPObject> <package: #ProfilerCPP> ^ self
Is this not enough? Why is there a call to mooseDescription? Help appreciated
Cheers, Alexandre -- _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
