Yes, that's enough. But, if you created these classes from scratch, you should also ensure that you refresh the meta-model :).

You can do it from the menu of the Meta Browser, or you can just execute:
MooseModel resetMeta

Doru

On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 3:58 PM, Alexandre Bergel <alexandre.bergel@me.com> wrote:
Hi!

I am building a small meta-models for c++ analysis.
I have created a class called PCPPFunction, a subclass of MooseEntity. (I know there is a FAMIXFunction, but the PCPPFunction is radically different from FAMIXFunction because if contains many information about dynamic analysis).

When I visualize instance of PCPPFunction, and I click on one, I get an error:


I guess I did not properly define the metamodel behind. But I do not see what is wrong. Here are the definitions:

PCPPObject class>>annotation
<MSEClass: #PCPPObject super: #MooseEntity>
<package: #ProfilerCPP>
^ self

PCPPFunction class>>annotation
<MSEClass: #PCPPFunction super: #PCPPObject>
<package: #ProfilerCPP>
^ self


Is this not enough? Why is there a call to mooseDescription? Help appreciated

Cheers,
Alexandre
-- 
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel  http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.




_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev




--
www.tudorgirba.com

"Every thing has its own flow"