16 Apr
2009
16 Apr
'09
10:23 p.m.
I do not understand your answer.
I think that this is important that FAMIX2.0 works well in sqMoose. so
that people can
smoothly port their code to sqMoose, so that we can check whether our
code extractor worked.
At the end we will just let it as an optional package.
Stef
On Apr 16, 2009, at 10:00 PM, Alexandre Bergel wrote:
Should be done. Was less automatic than expected.
Alexandre
On 16 Apr 2009, at 11:26, Tudor Girba wrote:
Hi Alex,
I would suggest to remove FAMIX2 from Moose-All, and just keep it
in the repository for other users.
Cheers,
Doru
On 13 Apr 2009, at 10:45, Alexandre Bergel wrote:
--
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Dear All,
I would like to know how far are we from getting rid of FAMIX2 in
the Pharo version of Moose? FAMIX2 comprises 55 classes and 1084
methods. I have never used any of these. Jannik, does DSM works on
FAMIX3 ?
Cheers,
Alexandre
--
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
--
www.tudorgirba.com
"Be rather willing to give than demanding to get."
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev