25 Nov
2008
25 Nov
'08
3:12 p.m.
I think that the class blueprint does it no?
Cheers,
Alexandre
On 25 Nov 2008, at 11:02, Simon Denier wrote:
On 25 nov. 08, at 11:35, Alexandre Bergel wrote:
--
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
But isPublic and isAbstract in Famix and
Famix-Java (what is that by
the way?) should not be the same.
isPublic is inferred from incoming calls in Smalltalk, whereas in
Where is it inferred? I didnt see that in the importer code (either
for famix2 or famix3) where any method is declared public by default.
Could be another tool?
Java it is specified from the programmer.
Alexandre
On 25 Nov 2008, at 06:55, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
--
Simon
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Hi doru
right now isAbstract and isPublic are in the Famix-Smalltalk and I
think that they should be in core.
After we could have isPackageProtected for Java in Famix-Java.
Stef
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
--
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev