On Nov 25, 2008, at 2:41 PM, Alexandre Bergel wrote:
So isAbstract et isPublic should be in core from my point of view.
I understood this. But Famix-Java should provide a different implementation of isPublic and isAbstract.
No. I do not see why. isPublic return if a method field is public.
in Smalltalk all methods are public and all attributes are protected. In java they are the way they are.
I agree with you, these methods should be in the core.
Cheers, Alexandre
On Nov 25, 2008, at 11:35 AM, Alexandre Bergel wrote:
But isPublic and isAbstract in Famix and Famix-Java (what is that by the way?) should not be the same. isPublic is inferred from incoming calls in Smalltalk, whereas in Java it is specified from the programmer.
Alexandre
On 25 Nov 2008, at 06:55, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
Hi doru
right now isAbstract and isPublic are in the Famix-Smalltalk and I think that they should be in core. After we could have isPackageProtected for Java in Famix-Java.
Stef _______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
-- _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
-- _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev