25 Sep
2015
25 Sep
'15
9:01 a.m.
Hi Anne,
Will you happen to also be at Bremen during VISSOFT? If yes, we could meet
on Sunday or Monday morning.
Cheers,
Doru
On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 7:50 AM, Anne Etien <anne.etien(a)univ-lille1.fr>
wrote:
Hi,
We are very happy that you are all waiting for MooseQuery integration. We
didn’t know that we could integrate it.
I have currently some personal problems to manage and so I am not very
available. Next week, I will be at ICSME (with the workshops, there will be
4 papers about software evolution analysis, with Moose or Pharo).
Jean-Christophe has a new associate professor position in Brest and so is
not very available neither.
We should be able to do the integration before the middle of Octobre.
Sorry for the delays.
Cheers,
Anne
Le 22 sept. 2015 à 22:51, Tudor Girba <tudor(a)tudorgirba.com> a écrit :
Yes, MooseQuery should be integrated now. I am waiting for that :)
Doru
On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 10:43 PM, Alexandre Bergel <
alexandre.bergel(a)me.com> wrote:
--
www.tudorgirba.com
"Every thing has its own flow"
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
--
www.tudorgirba.com
"Every thing has its own flow"
So
outgoingInvocation should normally give methods,
Shouldn’t it return invocations? It would be surprising that it return
methods.
This is what the new MooseQuery solves with the
two scoping selectors
that Anne mentionned
Yes, I had a look at MooseQuery, and apparently it deserves to be in the
image.
Alexandre
--
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev