I did the same with VerveineJ and I would still
like to work with
someone on this topic.
Cheers,
Doru
On 10 Feb 2011, at 20:55, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
Doru
I do not really understand why you do not help fixing verveineJ
since it is MIT/BSD and
that for us inFusion is still closed code.
What is the logic behind duplicating effort?
Stef
On Feb 10, 2011, at 10:14 AM, Tudor Girba wrote:
Hi,
As you might have noticed, we have new additions to Famix-Java:
- ParameterizableClass and ParameterizedType (to model generics
and templates - thanks Andre :))
- Enum and EnumValue (to model Java Enums)
- AnnotationTypeProperty and AnnotationInstanceProperty (to have
detailed information about AnnotationType and AnnotationInstance)
I am currently working with the inFusion guys to get the exporter
working with these new additions. It would be great to have also
VerveineJ up to date on this.
There are still open issues, and it would also be great to get
help on them:
- How to model the parameters of a ParameterizableClass as a Type
that can be used as declaredType. We should add some sort of a
local scope to a type. See:
http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=495
- I would like to have an explicit FAMIXInterface, but it is
slightly more difficult now that we have ParameterizableClass.
See:
http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=526
Cheers,
Doru
--
www.tudorgirba.com
"Be rather willing to give than demanding to get."
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
"Not knowing how to do something is not an argument for how it
cannot be done."
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch