25 Nov
2008
25 Nov
'08
2:22 p.m.
the idea is that we have a fmaix core and some extensions which can be
packaged differently.
So isAbstract et isPublic should be in core from my point of view.
Stef
On Nov 25, 2008, at 11:35 AM, Alexandre Bergel wrote:
But isPublic and isAbstract in Famix and Famix-Java
(what is that by
the way?) should not be the same.
isPublic is inferred from incoming calls in Smalltalk, whereas in
Java it is specified from the programmer.
Alexandre
On 25 Nov 2008, at 06:55, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
Hi doru
right now isAbstract and isPublic are in the Famix-Smalltalk and I
think that they should be in core.
After we could have isPackageProtected for Java in Famix-Java.
Stef
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
--
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev