30 Aug
2013
30 Aug
'13
1:36 p.m.
great!
thanks a lot for your continuous implication in the project
nicolas
On 08/30/2013 12:14 PM, Yuriy Tymchuk wrote:
Hi everyone!
I've done quite a lot of work on FAST restructuring and now there are
3 separate projects:
* http://www.smalltalkhub.com/#!/~Moose/FASTCore
<http://www.smalltalkhub.com/#%21/%7EMoose/FASTCore>
* http://www.smalltalkhub.com/#!/~Moose/FASTPharo
<http://www.smalltalkhub.com/#%21/%7EMoose/FASTPharo>
* http://www.smalltalkhub.com/#!/~Moose/FASTJava
<http://www.smalltalkhub.com/#%21/%7EMoose/FASTJava>
An image with everything loaded can be fetched from here:
https://ci.inria.fr/moose/job/FAST-On-Moose/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/FA…
Feedback is appreciated :)
Uko
On 20 ????. 2013, at 13:00, Tudor Girba <tudor(a)tudorgirba.com
<mailto:tudor@tudorgirba.com>> wrote:
--
Nicolas Anquetil -- RMod research team (Inria)
Well, you can start splitting the project
anyway.
Doru
On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 11:55 AM, Yuriy Tymchuk <yuriy.tymchuk(a)me.com
<mailto:yuriy.tymchuk@me.com>> wrote:
Ok, so as far as I understand - we'll release Moose 4.8 and then
I can start to integrate FAST into Moose 5?
Uko
On 17 ????. 2013, at 09:15, Yuriy Tymchuk <yuriy.tymchuk(a)me.com
<mailto:yuriy.tymchuk@me.com>> wrote:
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev Yes, I followed Stef's suggestion.
Moreover at the beginning I
wasn't so sure about what I'm doing, so I didn't want to mess
directly with FAMIX
Uko
????????? ? iPhone
16 ????. 2013 ? 22:08 Tudor Girba <tudor(a)tudorgirba.com
<mailto:tudor@tudorgirba.com>> ???????(??):
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch <mailto:Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch>
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
--
www.tudorgirba.com <http://www.tudorgirba.com/>
"Every thing has its own flow"
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch <mailto:Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch>
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev The AST should certainly be separate, like it
is now. But, it
would be more effective to have the FAMIX entity directly
linked with the AST. I used this pattern on a couple of
projects and it makes querying quite cheap.
Cheers,
Doru
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 6:19 PM, Nicolas Anquetil
<Nicolas.Anquetil(a)inria.fr <mailto:Nicolas.Anquetil@inria.fr>>
wrote:
As I remember it, it was a suggestion of Stephane and
Marcus to isolate FAST from FAMIX
nicolas
On 08/16/2013 03:42 PM, Tudor Girba wrote:
Also, I do not quite understand the need for the FAMIX
wrapper classes from FAST-Model. For example, you have
"FAMIXSourcedEntity subclass: #FASTBehaviouralEntity"
Why was FAMIXBehaviouralEntity not enough?
Doru
--
Nicolas Anquetil -- RMod research team (Inria)
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch <mailto:Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch>
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
--
www.tudorgirba.com <http://www.tudorgirba.com/>
"Every thing has its own flow"
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch <mailto:Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch>
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch <mailto:Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch>
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev