20 Feb
2009
20 Feb
'09
3:07 p.m.
On 20 févr. 09, at 14:53, Alexandre Bergel wrote:
Ah yes, sorry. But I would expect one to save different package
independently no ? Usually, I set a different comment for each
package I save.
Porting Moose to Squeak sometimes implies modifying multiple packages
at the same times, moving methods between packages, changing the
importer and the model and the tests...
Besides I still get one comment window for each package saved with
MooseAll, so I can still write a particular comment for each package
if necessary.
--
Simon
Dear SqMoose friends,
i was wondering whether Moose-All is necessary since we have
MooseLoader.
The dependencies defined on Moose-All could be made explicit said
in MooseLoader.
You still need MooseAll to make a single save of the multiple
packages of Moose. Not sure you can do that with the installer.