Yes, but wouldn't it be good to have a bug tracking system and
anytime
someone has time they could take a bug off the stack and fix it,
Some people are more involved with some packages than others so it
would be good to know this as well.
Of course I don't have the overview anymore of what is happening in
moose as I havent done much general moose coding just dynamoose
and a
few other small bits and pieces. So I guess this doesn't give me too
much of a say in moose.
Orla
On Jun 13, 2008, at 3:22 PM, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
Orla
this is not the problem. I will fix the error reporting and remove
the
deprecation.
Apparently I could not get the message that error reporting is a
nice
feature of an environment (you know a little
console) but apparently this is not useful.
Now my point is different. From what I see: everybody is perfectly
happy with moose
as it is, and migrating to Squeak + changing Famix + changing from
Meta to Fame does not seem to be a problem
to anybody so perfect.
> We need a tool to report errors centrally for each version of
> Moose -
> one place for Squeak Moose and one place for VW Moose.
> I agree that the deprecation of a method without fixing the
> callers
> is
> a problem.
>
> Doru is at the football match today so that explains why you are
> not
> getting immediate response.
Sure there is no problem I was aware of that :)
Now still this is a good test because in couple of month they may
be
roumanian football matches
everyday.
> But the whole of moose should not rely on
> Doru otherwise it will die sooner or later.
>
> We could set up a bugzilla. What do you think?
>
> Cheers
> Orla
>
>
> On Jun 13, 2008, at 3:02 PM, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
>
>> Yes but deprecating a method but not fixing its callers does not
>> help
>> Now I'm stuck. I do not know how to report errors in moose, there
>> is
>> broken code in Moose on VW
>> and on squeak this is not working either.
>>
>> I think that nobody cares about moose expect doru and we feel it.
>> Sad end for Moose. So I will certainly take over but what a pity.
>>
>> Stef
>>
>> On Jun 13, 2008, at 3:01 PM, Orla Greevy wrote:
>>
>>> I do remember this was discussed once along time ago. Dont we
>>> have
>>> some bugzilla type solution?
>>>
>>> If not we should introduce something here...
>>>
>>> Cheers
>>> Orla
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Jun 13, 2008, at 2:47 PM, stéphane ducasse wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi guys
>>>>
>>>> I checked and found that
>>>>
>>>> AbstractImporter>>errorLog: is deprecated.... ok fair
>>>>
>>>> Now there are at least 4 methods that invoke this method and
>>>> are
>>>> not
>>>> deprecated.
>>>> So what do we do?
>>>>
>>>> How do we log error in moose?
>>>> We don't?
>>>>
>>>> Stef
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Moose-dev mailing list
>>>> Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
>>>>
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Moose-dev mailing list
>>> Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
>>>
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
>>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Moose-dev mailing list
>> Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
>>
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Moose-dev mailing list
> Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
>
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
>
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch