17 Mar
2010
17 Mar
'10
midnight
If you load the latest packages of MooseAlgos, you should not have any problem.
On 16 mars 2010, at 21:37, Alexandre Bergel wrote:
Simon, do you know which test I should exclude?
I am currently conducting an experiment on Moose unit test, and the deadline is
approaching. Naturally, I could use an old version of Moose, but I do not think this is
the idea.
Cheers,
Alexandre
On 16 Mar 2010, at 07:52, Simon Denier wrote:
--
Simon
On 16 mars 2010, at 13:34, Alexandre Bergel wrote:
--
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev I also tried to load it in RC3. I somehow managed
(loadDefault does not seem to do the job).
But I couldn't run the test. They block after a while.
Yep, that's because old package versions from MooseAlgos got loaded, including the
one with a wrong recursive behavior which launch an infinite loop.
Cheers,
Alexandre
On 16 Mar 2010, at 06:51, Simon Denier wrote:
--
Simon
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Did anyone manage to load a clean Moose in Pharo 1.0 RC3?
I tried to load ConfigurationOfPharo first, then Moose, but it looks like it loads some
old packages even if I perform loadDefault.
--
Simon
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
--
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev