11 Feb
2011
11 Feb
'11
10:22 a.m.
OK Nicolas, I will check enums for VerveineJ next week.
ParameterizableClass and ParameterizedType are not in VerveineJ. What we
have in VerveineJ is the "old solution" using parameterTypes/argumentTypes.
I will check this too.
regards,
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 10:16 AM, Tudor Girba <tudor.girba(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Hi Nicolas,
I would suggest to first focus on getting VerveineJ working fully before
embarking into another large project like the VerveineC. The problem with
parsers is that if they are not working in edge cases they end up being
unused.
So, let's start a focused work on this to get it tested and scalable.
Cheers,
Doru
On 11 Feb 2011, at 10:04, Nicolas Anquetil wrote:
--
Andre Hora
VerveineC has been on my todo list for a long
time. It could work for C,
but I still have problem with the C++ parser of CDT (I
plan to use CDT for
VerveineC just as we are using JDT for VerveineJ). I almost started it
yesterday, but then I was abruptly remembered that there was a day long
meeting at INRIA.
Andre could work on enums for VerveineJ, it should not take more than
half a day.
ParameterizableClass and ParameterizedType are
already there I believe.
I am not sure what work is involved in AnnotationTypeProperty and
AnnotationInstanceProperty?
As for the two open questions, we just need some TIME to think about it.
The very
thing we all have in vast amount, ready to be spent at will :-)
nicolas
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
--
www.tudorgirba.com
"We cannot reach the flow of things unless we let go."
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
The logic
is extremely simple: They are investing the development
effort. I am simply answering questions and reviewing the results.
Moreover, their parser also supports C/C++ now, so that alone is a
huge plus.
indeed.
I did the same with VerveineJ and I would still
like to work with
someone on this topic.
Cheers,
Doru
On 10 Feb 2011, at 20:55, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
> Doru
>
> I do not really understand why you do not help fixing verveineJ
> since it is MIT/BSD and
> that for us inFusion is still closed code.
> What is the logic behind duplicating effort?
> Stef
>
> On Feb 10, 2011, at 10:14 AM, Tudor Girba wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> As you might have noticed, we have new additions to Famix-Java:
>> - ParameterizableClass and ParameterizedType (to model generics
>> and templates - thanks Andre :))
>> - Enum and EnumValue (to model Java Enums)
>> - AnnotationTypeProperty and AnnotationInstanceProperty (to have
>> detailed information about AnnotationType and AnnotationInstance)
>>
>> I am currently working with the inFusion guys to get the exporter
>> working with these new additions. It would be great to have also
>> VerveineJ up to date on this.
>>
>> There are still open issues, and it would also be great to get
>> help on them:
>> - How to model the parameters of a ParameterizableClass as a Type
>> that can be used as declaredType. We should add some sort of a
>> local scope to a type. See:
>> http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=495
>> - I would like to have an explicit FAMIXInterface, but it is
>> slightly more difficult now that we have ParameterizableClass.
>> See:
>> http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=526
>>
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Doru
>>
>>
>> --
>> www.tudorgirba.com
>>
>> "Be rather willing to give than demanding to get."
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Moose-dev mailing list
>> Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
>> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Moose-dev mailing list
> Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
--
www.tudorgirba.com
"Not knowing how to do something is not an argument for how it
cannot be done."
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev