25 Nov
2009
25 Nov
'09
12:31 p.m.
It would have been better to have in pharo two MOScatterPlot
one backward and a new one this way you say to users yes we consider your investment.
Right now I do not have the cycles to work on package blueprint but I really want to use
them.
So sometimes we should be a bit more clever.
Stef
Hi Stef,
But, there is a MOScatterplotLayout. It's just that Alex decided to implement the
layout differently by placing the x: and y: computation directly in the layout instead of
allowing each node to define its position.
You can see examples of the two APIs at MOLayoutTest>>testScatterplotLayout and
MOLayoutTest>>obsoleteTestScatterplot.
I actually think the current implementation is not a very good idea because you might
have different kinds of nodes that should be placed based on different considerations.
In any case, unfortunately the current Mondrian is not fully compatible with the VW one,
and there is no particular process to make it so.
Cheers,
Doru
On 25 Nov 2009, at 11:38, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
Hi
we started to port package blueprint to pharo and apparently there is no
ScatterPlotLayout in Mondrian in Pharo
Is there a reason?
What is the interface conformance between VW and pharo Mondrian?
Stef
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
--
www.tudorgirba.com
"Speaking louder won't make the point worthier."
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev