Hi,
Indeed, isAbstract and isPublic should be in the Core.
The blueprint indeed infers the private methods to be those methods that are called from inside the class. But, this is different from the isPublic field in the class. This field is to be populated by the parser. What the tools on top do with it, it is up to them.
Cheers, Doru
On Nov 25, 2008, at 3:12 PM, Alexandre Bergel wrote:
I think that the class blueprint does it no?
Cheers, Alexandre
On 25 Nov 2008, at 11:02, Simon Denier wrote:
On 25 nov. 08, at 11:35, Alexandre Bergel wrote:
But isPublic and isAbstract in Famix and Famix-Java (what is that by the way?) should not be the same. isPublic is inferred from incoming calls in Smalltalk, whereas in
Where is it inferred? I didnt see that in the importer code (either for famix2 or famix3) where any method is declared public by default. Could be another tool?
Java it is specified from the programmer.
Alexandre
On 25 Nov 2008, at 06:55, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
Hi doru
right now isAbstract and isPublic are in the Famix-Smalltalk and I think that they should be in core. After we could have isPackageProtected for Java in Famix-Java.
Stef _______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
-- _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
-- Simon
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
-- _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
-- www.tudorgirba.com www.tudorgirba.com/blog
"Not knowing how to do something is not an argument for how it cannot be done."