4 Mar
2015
4 Mar
'15
11:39 p.m.
Hi,
El 03/03/15 a las 15:34, stepharo escribió:
[...]
For me Moose can still focus on meta modeling and we could have "agile
visualization" but for that
we do not need FAME, FAMIX and all the Moose related business.
What I was suggesting to alex I told him more than a year ago was:
Build an image with
Roassal
CSV
JSON
XML
+ some math packages
No need to do that in the Moose Image: no need to have DSM, FCA, Metrics, FAME,
MooseModel.
Stef
That would be an image I would be interested in. I don't know how this
affect the Agile Visualization book. We have used it in some hackathons
and workshops here. Most of the people like the visuals and easiness of
the platform, but having the data taken from the software itself (the
classes and methods in Smalltalk for example) is far from what most
people want. Taking external data from cvs, json, xml, data bases and
making it computable/visualizable is the biggest concern. Seeing how
Smalltalk or other software looks inside accounts for the roots of Moose
as a software analysis tool, but in my experience, for Agile
Visualization, examples need to be more general and external.
Cheers,
Offray