Hi.
We used '@' because Pier used it this way. I'm afraid that if we
change the character that will break Pier.
But if you write *Chapter 1>../Chapter1/chapter1.pillar@cha:chapter1*
and export in HTML you'll get
<a href="../Chapter1/chapter1.html#cha:chapter1"> I. Chapter 1 </a>
On 23 May 2015 at 08:44, Norbert Hartl <norbert(a)hartl.name> wrote:
Cyril,
Am 22.05.2015 um 23:12 schrieb Cyril Ferlicot <cyril.ferlicot(a)gmail.com>om>:
The second main change is the Internal Links.
Now when you want to reefer to an anchor, a figure or a script you'll
need to use *@anchor* instead of *anchor*.
I'm sorry for that but that's the easiest way to implement the
inter-files links.
why @? It is about links and how to point to a fragment inside a resource.
This already exists and is called fragment identifier
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fragment_identifier
You do it by using # the separate the resource and the fragment in an URI.
'../chapters/chapter1.pillar#section1'
is complete valid URI and the way to go. Can you change that?
Norbert
--
Cheers
Cyril Ferlicot