20 Jan
2011
20 Jan
'11
2:41 p.m.
Hi,
I would argue strongly against it, because you are overriding too much the meaning of
#edges:. Instead, I would suggest adding a new selector called #edgesFromAssociations:.
Cheers,
Doru
On 20 Jan 2011, at 14:33, Alexandre Bergel wrote:
Hi!
For the last two years I have been writing code like:
view edges: { obj1 -> obj2 . obj3 -> obj4 } from: #key to: #value.
I have checked your code but I am wondering whether I am the only one
I think it would be cool to be able to write:
view edges: { obj1 -> obj2 . obj3 -> obj4 }
Does it make sense?
Cheers,
Alexandre
--
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
--
www.tudorgirba.com
"From an abstract enough point of view, any two things are similar."