Moose-dev

moose-dev@list.inf.unibe.ch

6621 discussions

[Reminder] This friday, Fame sprint.
by Adrian Kuhn 25 Sep '08

25 Sep '08

Dear All, this Friday, a Fame sprint will take place in Bern. Program - 11:00 rehearsal of Models at Runtime presentation. - Afterwards, happy hacking and pair programing. Links - http://www.iam.unibe.ch/~akuhn/d/Kuhn-2008-MRT-Fame.pdf - http://smallwiki.unibe.ch/fame/issues You are welcome to participate and/or attend the rehearsal. @Moose - if you have feature requests, please reply to this mail or add them on the wiki page! For example, I have seen that you are about to impl a visitor, this sounds like a nice job for Fame code generation. cheers, Adrian -- Adrian Kuhn Software Composition Group University of Bern, Switzerland http://www.iam.unibe.ch/~akuhn

2 1

How to I get all the packages ...
by Stéphane Ducasse 25 Sep '08

25 Sep '08

Hi doru I want to go from classes to packages. But when I click on 'all classes' item and select navigation packages I get 0. is it a bug? Stef

1 0

List of Properties
by Menanteau Jannick 22 Sep '08

22 Sep '08

Hi all, I would like to add some properties in the list "Select properties to add:" when I push "+" button. I have added this in my fonction in FamoosClass : <property: #LCOM1 longName: 'Lake of cohesion' description: 'Lake of cohesion' > but it don't appear in the list. Thanks for help Jannik

2 2

Re: More metrics in Moose?
by Adrian Kuhn 22 Sep '08

22 Sep '08

On 22 Sep 2008, at 16:37 , Holger Guhl wrote: > The project is for company CAST that has software for software > quality assessment. I know them, that's cool! > I have a simple question: Do you have more analysis methods and > metrics that are not yet published with Moose? You can find a pre-release of (some of) my current work here http://www.iam.unibe.ch/~akuhn/d/Kuhn-2008-WCRE-SoftwareMap.pdf > And how about correctness of the measured values? The class comment > states: "Right now only Number of MessageSends is computed in a > correct manner." On the first glance, I cannot see which of the > measured values could be wrong. Any hint on inappropriate > computation or improvement would be appreciated. The only thing I > see a bit confusing is the computation of two McCabe numbers > #cyclomaticNumber and #cyclomaticNumber2. Unfortunately, the class > comment does not tell enough. Correctness of measured values is a big issue. The correctness of the numbers that Moose produces is unknown. Even such simple measurements as the number of classes or method invocations might be wrong! Why? Moose uses the FAMIX model that has the aim to be language independent, which can only be achieved at the cost of less precision. Famix is this a lossy representation of software rather than precise, think JPEG vs PNG. For that reason I suggested some time ago to add an error range to all numbers, and started to take a look at some of the numbers. That is why there are two diff McCabe measurements. As far I recall, #cyclomaticNumber2 is more correct than #cyclomaticNumber. I only looked at McCabe and found it is not correct, so I guess other measurements need careful review too. But alas, I did not have time to complete that work... cheers, AA

2 1

Looking for a MooseModel walker
by stéphane ducasse 21 Sep '08

21 Sep '08

Hi guys We are looking for a model walker (visitor). Does any one of you already implement one? Stef

4 9

Some questions about iplasma
by Menanteau Jannick 19 Sep '08

19 Sep '08

Hi All, I would like to use iplasma and I have some questions about it : - is it always maintained ? - is there any important bugs ? - have you any idea about its future evolution ? Thanks Jannik

3 2

About MooseStrategy
by Stéphane Ducasse 18 Sep '08

18 Sep '08

Hi all in FAMIX2Class I have metamodelBelongsTo ^(Property name: #belongsTo type: FAMIX2Namespace) strategy: MooseStrategy; oppositeName: #class; isComposite: true; yourself What is a MooseStrategy: an object that controls the way objects are stored but it looks like only used in Meta. Stef

2 1

what do we do with Meta entity
by Stéphane Ducasse 18 Sep '08

18 Sep '08

Hi all I have metamodelBelongsTo ^(Property name: #belongsTo type: FAMIX2Namespace) strategy: MooseStrategy; oppositeName: #class; isComposite: true; yourself But Property is a Meta related entity so should we remove Property and the methods using it? Who said that it was obvious :( Stef

1 0

Re: [Fame-dev] Invocation question
by Adrian Kuhn 16 Sep '08

16 Sep '08

Hello Jacopo, You cannot model initializers in FAMIX (neither field initialization, nor instance or static initialization blocks). The same applies for doublebrace initialization, and many other features of Java. The main reason why is that Famix is supposed to be language independent and thus a lossy model of software rather than a precise one, think of JPEG vs GIF. Which is okay as long Famix is used for coarse-grained high-level analysis, it is obvious that Famix would be a bad choice for eg program transformation. But you best address this question to the Moose mailing list (see foward in CC). Fame is about the (meta)metamodeling-infrastructure only, not about concrete metamodels such as Famix. I have left the Moose team start fo this year, and maybe what I just said above is obsolete in the meantime... cheers, AA On 16 Sep 2008, at 12:11 , Jacopo Malnati wrote: > Hello everybody, > > still in the context of exporting Java code to MSE, I don't know > how to handle a dependency that comes from the initialization of a > class field. > > Let's say that a class has a field "myField" of type "MyType" and > that it gets declared in the body of the class and initialized with > a constructor, in place. > Something like: > > MyClass { > MyType myField = new MyType(...) > > } > > Now, this is an invocation (of a constructor) but in Famix 2.2 an > invocation is between 2 AbstractBehaviouralEntity and in this case, > it's not. In fact the initialization of a class field can be > outside any method, therefore I don't know how to model this > dependency. > > Is there any way I can model it? Or Famix 2.2 doesn't allow me to > model this situation? > > Thanks :) > > Jacopo

1 0

FMPragmaGenerator generateFAMIX2annotations metamodel explore
by Stéphane Ducasse 16 Sep '08

16 Sep '08

Does not work anymore in the latest version of FAME. Well... So I will rollback to an old version of Fame to perform the changes. Stef

6 27

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

Moose-dev