Already publicized on Facebook and Tweeter. Since there are not many emails these days, here it is:
Script of the day: visualizing dependencies between FAMIX classes and methods. Here is an example with SweetHome3D, a java application
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
methods := self flatCollect: #methods.
b := RTMondrian new.
b shape rectangle withTextAbove.
b nodes: self forEach: [ :cls |
b nodes: cls methods.
b layout grid.
].
b shape line
color: (Color red alpha: 0.2); width: 3.
b edges
objects: methods;
connectToAll: [ :m | m queryAllOutgoingInvocations atMethodScope ].
b layout circle .
b
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
The script has to be executed on 'all model classes', within the moose panel.
Cheers,
Alexandre
--
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu <http://www.bergel.eu/>
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
Hi!
I have produced:
GT-Inspector-AlexandreBergel.389
That replace:
GTExampleImpostorPragma>>= aImpostorPragma
^ self class = aImpostorPragma class
and: [ self method = aImpostorPragma method ]
by:
GTExampleImpostorPragma>>= aImpostorPragma
^ self class == aImpostorPragma class
and: [ self method == aImpostorPragma method ]
Performing #= between methods is pretty expensive and I see no reason why classes have to be compared with #= and not #==
Cheers,
Alexandre
--
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
---
testWhatTheHeck
self parse: 'true' rule: #condition.
self parse: 'true)' rule: #condition.
self parse: 'true' rule: #expression.
self parse: 'true)' rule: #expression.
---
First 3 tests pass, last one fails
But the grammar says:
---
condition
^ expression
---
Can anyone propose an explanation?
[Notes:
Yes I checked that I am testing the right grammar
Yes the 'true)' test is strange, but this is precisely what I am trying
to debug (why does it pass for #condition ?)
]
nicolas
--
Nicolas Anquetil
RMod team -- Inria Lille
Hi!
Some times ago non-declared variables where painted in blue. Apparently, they are now in red.
Can this behavior be restored?
Cheers,
Alexandre
--
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
Hi,
I’d like to know if there is some kind of comment extractor for a source code () in Moose.
I was trying to get a quick understanding of methods from an old code (not smalltalk) and I couldn’t get rid of the source code itself…
I need a way to get the comment associated to a method.
I could do it by myself but if there is already a way to do it I prefer to use it (or at least adapt it to my case).
Thanks,
--------------
Brice Govin
PhD student in RMoD research team at INRIA Lille
Software Engineer at THALES AIR SYSTEMS Rungis
ENSTA-Bretagne ENSI2014
22 Avenue du General Leclerc 92340 BOURG-LA-REINE
Hi
I have a bag
b := Bag new.
b add: 1 withOccurrences: 5.
b add: 3 withOccurrences: 4.
b add: 6.
b
and I would like to display it as an histogram with roassal.
Stef
