Moose-dev

moose-dev@list.inf.unibe.ch

6630 discussions

by Stéphane Ducasse

> On 3 Dec 2019, at 11:46, Nour Jihene Agouf <a.n.djihan(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > Hello, > > The ClassNames Blueprint is based on packages (package models). There is no package model in the moose panel when generating an mse file of a certain project. How do you import it. let us move this discussion to the moose mailing0-list > However, if we import FAMIX smalltalk model from the current image we get "all package models" in the moose panel which shows a FAMIXPackageGoup of the selected packages which we can later on visualize. > This way the FeatureSelector (first layer) from my thesis project will be replaced by: directly selecting the packages we want to visualize from the moose panel and calling the new visualize method. > > Basically these will be the steps: > 1- Import FAMIX smalltalk model from the current image, > 2- click on all package models, > 3- "self visualiseCNB" => this method will visualize the ClassNames Blueprint of the selected packages. No click we should be able to program that. Then and only then we can have an action in the menu. Stef > > Nour > > > Le lun. 25 nov. 2019 à 21:57, Nour Jihene Agouf <a.n.djihan(a)gmail.com <mailto:a.n.djihan@gmail.com>> a écrit : > Okey I'm on it :) > > Le lun. 25 nov. 2019 à 21:32, Stéphane Ducasse <stephane.ducasse(a)inria.fr <mailto:stephane.ducasse@inria.fr>> a écrit : > here is what I suggest. > > You create a separate package that should be the only one manipulating Moose metamodel. > This way your project will work without Moose and when you load this extra package, it will work with Moose. > > S. > >> On 25 Nov 2019, at 21:13, Nour Jihene Agouf <a.n.djihan(a)gmail.com <mailto:a.n.djihan@gmail.com>> wrote: >> >> Okey, I will :) >> >> Le lun. 25 nov. 2019 à 21:09, Stéphane Ducasse <stephane.ducasse(a)inria.fr <mailto:stephane.ducasse@inria.fr>> a écrit : >>> >>> >>> Hello, >>> >>> Yes that would be great! >> >> Ok we will come back with a list >> The first one is to make sure that your visualsiation (class name blueprint can run on top of Moose) >> you should ask for help on discord about Moose). >> >>> >>> And about the visa, unfortunately there is no available dates to submit my visa application;, the closest date is in January 2020. Taking under consideration the time for the file processing which is about 2 to 3 months, should I ask Alexia for an other promise of employment starting from 01/03/2020? I hope I receive the hosting agreement before January, However, I don't know if this delay has other complications, if so let me know please. >> >> no ask again >>> >>> Nour >>> >>> >>> Le lun. 25 nov. 2019 à 17:19, Stéphane Ducasse <stephane.ducasse(a)inria.fr <mailto:stephane.ducasse@inria.fr>> a écrit : >>> Hi nour >>> >>> We are discussing with Oleksandr and we were thinking if we should propose you some small objectives >>> so that you can learn more waiting for your visa. >>> >>> So let me know. >>> >>> Stef >>> -------------------------------------------- >>> Stéphane Ducasse >>> http://stephane.ducasse.free.fr <http://stephane.ducasse.free.fr/> / http://www.pharo.org <http://www.pharo.org/> >>> 03 59 35 87 52 >>> Assistant: Julie Jonas >>> FAX 03 59 57 78 50 >>> TEL 03 59 35 86 16 >>> S. Ducasse - Inria >>> 40, avenue Halley, >>> Parc Scientifique de la Haute Borne, Bât.A, Park Plaza >>> Villeneuve d'Ascq 59650 >>> France >>> >> >> -------------------------------------------- >> Stéphane Ducasse >> http://stephane.ducasse.free.fr <http://stephane.ducasse.free.fr/> / http://www.pharo.org <http://www.pharo.org/> >> 03 59 35 87 52 >> Assistant: Julie Jonas >> FAX 03 59 57 78 50 >> TEL 03 59 35 86 16 >> S. Ducasse - Inria >> 40, avenue Halley, >> Parc Scientifique de la Haute Borne, Bât.A, Park Plaza >> Villeneuve d'Ascq 59650 >> France >> > > -------------------------------------------- > Stéphane Ducasse > http://stephane.ducasse.free.fr <http://stephane.ducasse.free.fr/> / http://www.pharo.org <http://www.pharo.org/> > 03 59 35 87 52 > Assistant: Julie Jonas > FAX 03 59 57 78 50 > TEL 03 59 35 86 16 > S. Ducasse - Inria > 40, avenue Halley, > Parc Scientifique de la Haute Borne, Bât.A, Park Plaza > Villeneuve d'Ascq 59650 > France > -------------------------------------------- Stéphane Ducasse http://stephane.ducasse.free.fr / http://www.pharo.org 03 59 35 87 52 Assistant: Julie Jonas FAX 03 59 57 78 50 TEL 03 59 35 86 16 S. Ducasse - Inria 40, avenue Halley, Parc Scientifique de la Haute Borne, Bât.A, Park Plaza Villeneuve d'Ascq 59650 France

5 years, 4 months

Internship for a Master research in computer science

by Jannik Laval

Dear colleagues, You will find, in the following link, a proposal for a Master research in computer science or equivalent, for February 2020 at the DISP laboratory, Lyon. https://www.disp-lab.fr/?q=fr/content/stage-m2-banc-de-tests-d%E2%80%99%C3%…<https://www.disp-lab.fr/?q=fr/content/stage-m2-banc-de-tests-d’échanges-de-…> Best regards -- ~~Jannik Laval~~ Enseignant-chercheur Responsable Pédagogique Licence Coordonnateur de Projet en Systèmes d'Information IUT Lumière, Université Lumière Lyon 2 laboratoire DISP +33 4 78 77 43 06 http://www.jannik-laval.eu http://www.phratch.com http://www.approchealpes.info

5 years, 4 months

Play Page File Extension

by Sean P. DeNigris

Is there a benefit to giving saved play pages a custom extension (.ph)? I tried to DND one into a P7 image and it failed because there is no handler for that extension, even thought it's "just code"... ----- Cheers, Sean -- Sent from: http://forum.world.st/Moose-f1310756.html

5 years, 5 months

Re: [Pharo-dev] FOSDEM rooms are available

by Esteban Lorenzano

> On 29 Oct 2019, at 11:05, tesonep(a)gmail.com wrote: > > Yes, I will love to participate. > I think that the most important is to have a good presence as a stand > in the hall. > I will love to do that. I will be there too, at least one day. Esteban > About the talks, we can propose anything, even something about the VM. > We have to analyze what are the things that are applicable to other > languages and technologies, to avoid comments like: "that happen to > you because you have an image". > Also we need to show us open and good to team work with other technologies. > > Thanks! > > On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 at 10:25 AM Santiago Bragagnolo > <santiagobragagnolo(a)gmail.com <mailto:santiagobragagnolo@gmail.com>> wrote: >> >> >> To whom does not know, FOSDEM is one of the biggest Open source conferences. It is free, it does not require subscription, and it happens during a weekend (1 and 2 february) at bruxelles at the university ULB ( https://fosdem.org/2020/practical/transportation/) . It requires some human engagement only. >> This is a good place not only for Pharo, but for all open source projects Smalltalk related. And finally for smalltalk it self. >> >> On the available rooms where we could show something >> >> IOT (https://fosdem.org/2020/schedule/track/internet_of_things/ ) >> Allex? maybe you can show some of the things we are doing here? >> Mariano Peck? I don't know if your IOT work is or not open source. But if it is. it could be a good place for showing >> >> BigData (https://fosdem.org/2020/schedule/track/hpc_big_data_and_data_science/) >> I could propose the EQL experiment with Map reduce? Is it a good Idea? . >> Matteo You could present something on debugging nodes. >> Oleks I remember you had some big data related stuff (sorry for the lack of detail awareness :) ) >> >> Communication (https://fosdem.org/2020/schedule/track/collaborative_information_and_conten… >> https://fosdem.org/2020/schedule/track/coding_for_language_communities/ ) >> Offray! I think there is space for graphoscope in here. If you can give a talk, great, if not, i propose my self to be the speaker (of course in that case i will need some couching and teaching on the usage). >> >> Debugging Tools >> Matteo! you could also propose your work in here >> Steven You have already a talk prepared no? >> Thomas You have already a talk prepared no? >> Guille I know you are completely out of reach, but, what about your debugging multi level for the VM? If you want we can propose it together with Pablo. >> >> >> Minimalistic / Emerging Language >> Steph with Pharo >> Carolina The bootstraping for minimallistic language is a good talk and it would not require much preparation since you have already a talk prepared >> Steph/Pablo maybe something on stateful traits? >> >> Open research tools >> Anne/Nico/Cyril/Julian/Benoit Moose? We have to have a talk on moose. Or even many. We could propose moose as platform, but i think it would be better to present it by it fruits. The same as before, i would not mind to give the presentation if couching and slides are provided. >> Serge PolyMath?? >> Nick Lands! Such a beatiful project. Not sure if it completely fit in here. I think so. Sorry if not :). >> >> >> On the pharo stand >> >> I am doing what is required to have a stand for Pharo this year. >> I will keep you updated, if we got it, i would really like to have posters not only of Pharo, but also of our more stable and powerful frameworks, the research teams and enterprises that work with it . And of course I will need some help for the stand (specially if it happens that i have some talk) >> >> Maybe we could use this thread for discussing organization and a second one to gather abstracts and applications. >> >> Santiago >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> El mar., 29 oct. 2019 a las 9:29, Santiago Bragagnolo (<santiagobragagnolo(a)gmail.com>) escribió: >>> >>> I could present TaskIT of course, but i don't feel it matching in the proposed categories. There is not debugging, nor emerging minimalist language nor research tools. I will check on the other rooms to see if i find a place where i can do it. >>> >>> >>> >>> El lun., 28 oct. 2019 a las 21:00, ducasse (<stepharo(a)netcourrier.com>) escribió: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On 28 Oct 2019, at 18:15, Santiago Bragagnolo <santiagobragagnolo(a)gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> That is great. We should post in all of them if possible. >>>> I think that Steven could show object centric debugging, someone (anne maybe? ) present moose. and for minimalistic experimental emerging languages carolina could propose candle and the bootstrap processes. >>>> I think that Steven and Carolina talks are mature enough after all the trials, and a moose talk could be really cool. Maybe Julien's SQL or Benoit's translations should be really good for catching potential students and specially some investment capital for the team :). >>>> >>>> Sadly me i don't have much to show :(. >>>> But if we have the stand i plan to be there. >>>> >>>> >>>> TaskIt? >>>> I could do a presentation of Pharo in the minimalist…. and carolina a talk showing how to bootstrap. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> El lun., 28 oct. 2019 a las 16:41, ducasse (<stepharo(a)netcourrier.com>) escribió: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> https://fosdem.org/2020/news/2019-10-01-accepted-developer-rooms/ >>>>> I do not know in which one we want to participate >>>>> >>>>> Debugging Tools >>>>> Minimalistic, Experimental and Emerging Languages >>>>> Open Research Tools and Technologies >>>>> >>>>> How do we coordinate? >>>>> >>>>> S. >>>> >>>> > > > -- > Pablo Tesone. > tesonep(a)gmail.com <mailto:tesonep@gmail.com>

5 years, 5 months

Re: [Pharo-dev] FOSDEM rooms are available

by Santiago Bragagnolo

That is great. We should post in all of them if possible. I think that Steven could show object centric debugging, someone (anne maybe? ) present moose. and for minimalistic experimental emerging languages carolina could propose candle and the bootstrap processes. I think that Steven and Carolina talks are mature enough after all the trials, and a moose talk could be really cool. Maybe Julien's SQL or Benoit's translations should be really good for catching potential students and specially some investment capital for the team :). Sadly me i don't have much to show :(. But if we have the stand i plan to be there. El lun., 28 oct. 2019 a las 16:41, ducasse (<stepharo(a)netcourrier.com>) escribió: > > https://fosdem.org/2020/news/2019-10-01-accepted-developer-rooms/ > I do not know in which one we want to participate > > Debugging Tools > Minimalistic, Experimental and Emerging Languages > Open Research Tools and Technologies > > How do we coordinate? > > S. >

5 years, 5 months

The Lands Platform at SLE 2019: Pharo magic inside

by Nick Papoylias

The Lands Platform: Lan.guages and D.omain S.yntax, @sleconf 2019, co-located with @splashcon https://youtu.be/HMgJK8mVPYw Showcasing live magic tricks powered by the @pharoproject Best, Nick

5 years, 5 months

Glamour: Updating Dependent Presentations

by Sean P. DeNigris

Here's a snippet from my builder method: ... views do: [ :d | container tree act: [ :tree :projects | "change the model." tree update ] iconName: #back on: $n entitled: 'New Project'; ... ]. Each tree represents a different view on the same data. When the action is performed, they all need to be updated. I tried replacing `tree update` with `container update`, but that didn't work. Ideas? ----- Cheers, Sean -- Sent from: http://forum.world.st/Moose-f1310756.html

5 years, 6 months

Moose 8 - Progress on generator management

by Cyril Ferlicot

Hi! Today I finished a refactoring on Moose 8 and I wanted to keep everyone informed. Since Moose 7 we have multiple metamodels and we generate them via a generator. Each metamodel has a FMMetaRepository used to build tools and to query our models. This FMMetaRepository was created by the generators. This had some drawbacks such as: - You need to have your generator in the image to be able to query your model - You cannot write a new metamodel without generator Now this changed, the FMMetaRepository is created and stored in the subclasses of MooseModel specific to the metamodel currently used. The change should be transparent, except that you will need to regenerate your metamodel for it to be effective. Have a nice day. -- Cyril Ferlicot https://ferlicot.fr

5 years, 6 months

Saving Moose model in MongoDB

by Jannik Laval

Hi everyone, I am trying to save a moose model into MongoDB, using Voyage (Pharo 7, Moose 8). My problem is that it is not a tree. So I declared MooseEntity as voyageRoot. Now, it seems I have a loop into my graph. Do you have any idea of ho to debug that ? Cheers, -- ~~Jannik Laval~~ Enseignant-chercheur Responsable Pédagogique Licence Coordonnateur de Projet IUT Lumière, Université Lumière Lyon 2 laboratoire DISP +33 4 78 77 43 06 http://www.jannik-laval.eu http://www.phratch.com http://www.approchealpes.info

5 years, 6 months

PhD position

by Jannik Laval

[Apologies for Cross-Posting] Dear all, At DISP Lab, at Lyon, France, we have a PhD opening on « Ensuring Interoperability for "smart" information systems". More information are following. What is important is that all the development will be done using Pharo/Moose. If you are interested, please contact me by answering this mail. ===== Ph.D. thesis (CIFRE) Berger Levrault and DISP Lab, Lyon, France Title: Ensuring Interoperability for "smart" information systems Enterprise: Berger Levrault Research Laboratory: DISP Lab Where: Lyon, France Recruitment date: As soon as possible Application deadline: As soon as possible Function: 3 years PhD candidate position in Berger Levrault (CDI). The position will be part time between Berger Levrault and DISP Lab. Research topic : data interoperability, application exchange protocols, service-oriented architecture, event architecture, semantics, monitoring. Context: The need for sharing, exchanging and promoting information from information systems is constantly increasing and now represents a major concern in the various reforms of the local public sector (consolidation of local authorities, implementation of in place in 2016 Hospital Group Territory, Digital Republic). It is therefore essential to design "platforms" capable of providing answers to the rationalisation and simplification of data exchanges between software applications and with the outside world to promote and simplify the application of all these reforms. In addition, service-oriented architectures and event architectures (SOA, EDA) are mature and widely used. At Berger-Levrault, their implementation ensures the scalability and maintainability of solutions. These architectures are characterised by the flexibility and the loose coupling of the subsystems that compose them (ie services, applications, IS ...) and rely on several means (Hohpe & Woolf, 2004) to route the data within this network of systems communicating. At this stage of maturity, we observe that these data exchanges are operational and meet the requirements of interoperability between heterogeneous systems (Leal, 2019). Nevertheless, the number of standards recognised and used by the French public sector, the privileged sector of Berger-Levrault, increases the level of interconnection difficulties (Kurniawan & Ashari, 2015) of the different solutions developed by Berger-Levrault. This is all the more remarkable when it comes to communicating with external solutions or platforms (partners and / or competitors). This multiplicity of exchanges and types of exchanges generates a great deal of complexity and highlights the need to master the exchange system as effectively as possible. Berger Levraut today lacks visibility on existing exchanges and mechanisms to evaluate them (Leal, Guédria, & Panetto, 2019) which complicates the detection of dysfunctions and the discovery of their origins. Moreover, it is essential for the Berger-Levrault applications to be able to adapt to the new rules and standards while continuing to integrate the dematerialization of the public service. The evolution of these modalities has an almost systematic impact on the exchange of data put in place to ensure interoperability. Hence the need to build flexible and scalable exchange architectures and to follow the evolution of these exchanges. These transformations imply a large volume of data exchanged and subject to variations that can be strong during periods of "high attendance" such as elections by electronic vote. The very nature of exchanges can be affected especially with the multiplicity of connected objects (Buyya & Dastjerdi, 2016). These are increasingly used by public institutions for the benefit of the management of city facilities or user services. The increase in volumes of data exchanged therefore implies the implementation of exchange architectures that are able to support the load but also the great variability of the types and frequencies of data production. This requires distributed architectures (in infrastructure and flow), adaptable or even self-adaptable (Gascon-Samson et al 2015) to promote the system's resistance to faults while avoiding potential congestion phenomena. Based on this reflection, a research project was conducted in partnership by Berger-Levrault and the DISP laboratory (Amokrane et al., 2018). These early works have identified a set of scientific and technical barriers: • Lack of visibility on existing interoperability exchanges. Indeed, the current exchanges are not traced and the existing monitoring mechanisms focus mainly on low level information, such as the performance of the infrastructure or the use of the memory, without correlation with business information. In addition, few methods for evaluating interoperability are concerned with the effective evaluation (a posteriori of the implementation) of the interoperability of the data, and few of them are tooled (Leal, Guédria, & Panetto, 2019). • The complexity of trade maintenance. This is due to the lack of traceability of the exchanges, on the one hand, and that of the evolution of the exchange architecture configurations on the other hand. This complicates the identification of failures or dysfunctions and the analysis of their causes, and poses difficulties for the setting up of mechanisms of alerts or significant notifications. In addition, the lack of capitalisation of information relating to trade does not allow to consider a forecast maintenance. • The development of the different modules of the exchange system is manual and the remediation of malfunctions is done in an ad hoc manner. In addition to the cost of development and correction that this implies, this does not meet the responsiveness requirements of some business areas. Hence the need to build adaptable exchange systems using dynamic interoperability hubs (Agostinho, et al., 2016). The objective of this thesis proposal is to produce an approach to the implementation cycle of application exchanges, from design to maintenance, which will enhance the reliability and resilience of the interoperability exchange system. The solution will ultimately orchestrate all the application and service exchanges to ensure optimisation of the use of software and infrastructure resources of public institutions. To meet the needs in terms of interoperability, the work to be carried out is articulated in two axes that we structure as follows: - A flexible architecture for the implementation of interoperability. Here we consider the basic functionalities reflecting the activities necessary for the establishment of the means of interoperability. - A reflexive architecture for managing interoperability at a meta-level. This axis relates to setting up means of administration, monitoring and maintenance of the exchange network set up for interoperability. The work must also incorporate the concepts of security, scalability and usability. Requirements to be met when developing any solution to lift the locks and meet the objectives of this thesis work. ----- Agostinho, C., Ducq, Y., Zacharewicz, G., Sarraipa, J., Lampathaki, F., Poler, R., & Jardim-Goncalves, R. (2016). Towards a sustainable interoperability in networked enterprise information systems: Trends of knowledge and model-driven technology. Computers in Industry, 79, 64 - 76. doi:10.1016/j.compind.2015.07.001 Al-Dhuraibi, Y., Paraiso, F., Djarallah, N., & Merle, P. (2017). Elasticity in cloud computing: state of the art and research challenges. IEEE Transactions on Services Computing, (pp. 430-447). Amokrane, N., Laval, J., Lanco, P., Derras, M., & Moalla, N. (2018). Analysis of Data Exchanges, Contribution to Data Interoperability Assessment. 9th international Conference on Intelligent Systems 2018. Madeira, Portugal. Andary, J. F., & Sage, A. P. (2010). The role of service oriented architectures in systems engineering. Information Knowledge Systems Management, 9(1), 47-74. Belfadel, A., Laval, J., Cherifi, C., & Moalla, N. (2018). Towards service orchestration through software capability profile. I-ESA Interoperability for Enterprise Systems and Applications 2018. Berlin, Germany. Bernus, P., Goranson, T., Gøtze, J., Jensen-Waud, A., Kandjani, H., Molina, A., . . . Turner, P. (2016). Enterprise engineering and management at the crossroads. Computers in Industry, 79, 87 - 102. doi:10.1016/j.compind.2015.07.010 Buyya, R., & Dastjerdi, A. V. (2016). Internet of Things: Principles and paradigms. Elsevier. Cabot, J., Clarisó, R., Brambilla, M., & Gérard, S. (2017). Cognifying model-driven software engineering. Federation of International Conferences on Software Technologies: Applications and Foundations (pp. pp. 154-160). Springer. Chappell, D. (2004). Enterprise Service Bus. : O'Reilly Media, Inc. Cheung, A. K., & Jacobsen, H. A. (2010). Load balancing content-based publish/subscribe systems. ACM Transactions on Computer Systems (TOCS). Chhun, S., Moalla, N., & Ouzrout, Y. (2016). QoS ontology for service selection and reuse. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 27(1), 187-199. Crosby, M., Pattanayak, P., Verma, S., & Kalyanaraman, V. (2016). Blockchain technology: Beyond bitcoin. Applied Innovation, 2(6-10). Curry, E. (2004). Message-oriented middleware, Middleware for communications,. Czarnecki, K., Eisenecker, U., Glück, R., Vandevoorde, D., & Veldhuizen, T. (2000). Generative programming and active libraries. Generic Programming (pp. pp. 25-39). Berlin, Heidelberg.: Springer. Erl, T. (2005). Service-oriented architecture: concepts, technology, and design. Prentice Hall Professional Technical Reference. Fahad, M., Moalla, N., & Bouras, A. (2012). Detection and resolution of semantic inconsistency and redundancy in an automatic ontology merging system. Journal of Intelligent Information Systems, 39(2), 535-557. Fahad, M., Moalla, N., Bouras, A., Abdul Qadir, M., & Farukh, M. (2011). Towards Classification of Web Ontologies for the Emerging Semantic Web. Journal of Universal Computer Science, 17(7), 1021-1042. Fülöp, L. J., Tóth, G., Rácz, R., Pánczél, J., Gergely, T., Beszédes, A., & Farkas, L. (2010). Survey on complex event processing and predictive analytics. the Fifth Balkan Conference in Informatics, (pp. pp. 26-31). Gascon-Samson, J., Garcia, F. P., Kemme, B., & Kienzle, J. (2015). Dynamoth: A scalable pub/sub middleware for latency-constrained applications in the cloud. In 2015 IEEE 35th International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems , (pp. pp. 486-496). Gokhale, A., Schmidt, D. C., Natarajan, B., & Wang, N. (2002). Applying model-integrated computing to component middleware and enterprise applications. Communications of the ACM, (pp. 65-70). Hachicha, M., Moalla, N., Fahad, M., & Ouzrout, Y. (2015). Performance assessment architecture for collaborative business processes in BPM-SOA based environments. International journal of Data & Knowledge Engineering, 105, 73-89. Hohpe, G., & Woolf, B. (2004). Enterprise integration patterns: Designing,building, and deploying messaging solutions. Addison-Wesley Professional. Khare, S., Sun, H., Zhang, K., Gascon-Samson, J., Gokhale, A., Koutsoukos, X., & Abdelaziz, H. (2018). Scalable edge computing for low latency data dissemination in topic-based publish/subscribe. In 2018 IEEE/ACM Symposium on Edge Computing (SEC) (pp. pp. 214-227). IEEE. Kurniawan, K., & Ashari, A. (2015). Service orchestration using enterprise service bus for real-time government executive dashboard system. 2015 International Conference on Data and Software Engineering (ICoDSE), (pp. 207-212). Yogyakarta. doi:10.1109/ICODSE.2015.7436999 Laval, J., Cherifi, C., & Cheutet, V. (2018). Towards the measurement of Enterprise Information Systems agility to support EIS improving projects. International Journal of Agile Systems and Management, 11(3):222–246. Leal, G. D. (2019). Support à la décision pour l'analyse de l'interopérabilité des systèmes dans un contexte d'entreprises en réseau. (Doctoral dissertation, Université de Lorraine). Leal, G., Guédria, W., & Panetto, H. (2019). Interoperability Assessment: A Systematic Literature Review. Computers in Industry (In Press). Luckham, D. C. (2011). Event processing for business: organizing the real-time enterprise. John Wiley & Sons. Mallek, S. (2012). Contribution au développement de l’interopérabilité en entreprise : vers une approche anticipative de détection de problèmes d’interopérabilité dans des processus collaboratifs. Object Management Group. (2006). Méta Object Facility (MOF) 2.0 Core Specification. Panettoa, H., Zdravkovicc, M., Jardim-Goncalvesd, R., Romeroe, D., Cecilg, J., & Mezgárh, I. (2016). New perspective for the future interoperable enterprise systems. Computers in Industry, s.l. : Elsevier, 79, 47-63. doi:10.1016/j.compind.2015.08.001 WSO2. (2015). The Evolution of Integration: A Comprehensive Platform for a Connected Business. White Paper. Récupéré sur http://wso2.com/ -- ~~Jannik Laval~~ Enseignant-chercheur Responsable Pédagogique Licence Coordonnateur de Projet IUT Lumière, Université Lumière Lyon 2 laboratoire DISP +33 4 78 77 43 06 http://www.jannik-laval.eu http://www.phratch.com http://www.approchealpes.info

5 years, 6 months

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

Moose-dev