Moose-dev

moose-dev@list.inf.unibe.ch

6621 discussions

by Alexandre Bergel

Hi! Yesterday Doru gave me some bug reports. I wrote tests that identify them and subsequently killed the bugs. If you have encountered some bugs in Mondrian and you haven't reported them, please report them asap. I know that Mondrian has seen a decrease in its performances recently. I am currently working on it. But is there something else ? Cheers, Alexandre -- _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.

15 years, 2 months

Mondrian-Alexandre_Bergel.426

by Tudor Girba

Hi Alex, Mondrian-Alexandre_Bergel.426 is not part of the latest ancestry. Is this by intent or by mistake? Cheers, Doru -- www.tudorgirba.com "Speaking louder won't make the point worthier."

15 years, 2 months

Adding accessing methods

by Alexandre Bergel

hi! What about adding in FAMIXClass: withAllSubclasses, allSubclasses, superclasses, withAllSuperclasses, allSuperclasses FAMIXClass should be somewhat polymorphic to Behavior. That would be useful... I can do it. Any opinion? Cheers, Alexandre -- _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.

15 years, 2 months

First pass for generic DSM

by Laval Jannik

Hi all, I am trying to make DSM generic. In the last version of DSM, we can make a DSM based on nodes and edges. Only the basic DSM works on it (dsm with colors). And I have to debug the interaction of the visualization. In the package DSMCore, I made a class DSMExample with, for now, 2 examples. Here is an example: ==== dSMMatrix := DSMMatrix withNodes: #(#1 #2 #3) edges: #(#(#1 #2) #(#2 #1) #(#3 #1)). view := MOViewRenderer new. DSMVisualization new open: dSMMatrix on: view. view open ==== We make a DSM with nodes and a collection of edges. An edge is a collection of two elements: the source and the target. I think I will do a third element to add informations for other DSM. You can try it, and make comments. I will pay attention to your idea to have a better generic DSM. Cheers --- Jannik Laval

15 years, 2 months

Cobol to MOOSE?

by Stephan Eggermont

What support for Cobol is available in MOOSE? Is there a MSE generator, or do I need to build my own parser/generator? Stephan Eggermont

15 years, 2 months

About Configuration

by stephane ducasse

Alex is it on purpose that the default mondrian configuration of load 17 and that in the metacelloRepository you have 5 or 6 more recent ones? It is important to consider that you should publish in Mondrian and copy in metacelloRepository. MetacelloRepository can disappear tomorrow. Stef

15 years, 2 months

Smalltalk Syntax (was: Re: Re: First pass for generic DSM)

by Lukas Renggli

>> dSMMatrix := DSMMatrix withNodes: #(#1 #2 #3) edges: #(#(#1 #2) #(#2 #1) >> #(#3 #1)). Just as a side remark, but I already stumbled several times over code like the above in Mondrian and Glamour: #1 " is not valid Smalltalk " It does not parse with any parser other then the default one in Pharo/Squeak. Up until a few minutes ago it broke the refactoring engine badly. Pharo strangely compiles the above expression to the number 1. So why not just put the number, which also saves you one character? 1 " is a valid number " To get a symbol with 1 you need to put the number in quotes: #'1' " is a valid symbol " Lukas -- Lukas Renggli www.lukas-renggli.ch

15 years, 2 months

Glamour - GLMTablePresentation columns name

by Cyrille Delaunay

Hello, I'm building a browser with gamour and I use a GLMTablePresentation. There is a thing I would like to do: I would like to set a specific name to my GLMTablePresentation colums according the output value send from another presentation of the browser. The first intuition I had was to specify the name of the column using a block: GLMTablePresentation new column: [:input | input anyOne class asString]. but we can't do that. Is it possible to do it in another way?

15 years, 2 months

glamour tree children by level

by Tudor Girba

Hi, I added the possibility to specify the children of a tree also based on the level at which the item resides. An example can be found here: GLMBasicExamples>>treeWithChildrenByLevel Stef, this solves a problem of easily showing both categories and selectors (both being represented by symbols) in the same tree :). Cheers, Doru -- www.tudorgirba.com "There are no old things, there are only old ways of looking at them."

15 years, 2 months

Classes without #annotation

by Simon Denier

Hi I notice that the following classes are not described in Fame. Now they are Group classes, so it's not so important as instances are dynamically created. However, MooseGroup and similar are described. So should we be consistent with the rule? DudeDuplicationGroup DudeMultiplicationGroup FAMIXFileGroup FAMIXFolderGroup FAMIXGlobalVariableGroup FAMIXNamespaceGroup -- Simon

15 years, 2 months

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

Moose-dev