Moose-dev June 2013

moose-dev@list.inf.unibe.ch

36 participants
163 discussions

Issue 709 in moose-technology: add Moose-Eclipse-Plugin in Moose

by moose-technology＠googlecode.com

Status: New Owner: ---- Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium New issue 709 by jannik.l...(a)gmail.com: add Moose-Eclipse-Plugin in Moose http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=709 I don't know if we integrate it in Moose. But we need to do something: a web page on the Moose site, with how to load it.

10 years, 11 months

Re: Issue 156 in moose-technology: The table presentation for Glamour should provide dynamic sorting and column manipulation

by moose-technology＠googlecode.com

Updates: Summary: The table presentation for Glamour should provide dynamic sorting and column manipulation Comment #14 on issue 156 by tudor.gi...(a)gmail.com: The table presentation for Glamour should provide dynamic sorting and column manipulation http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=156 (No comment was entered for this change.)

10 years, 11 months

Re: Issue 254 in moose-technology: inFusion default initializer export to MSE

by moose-technology＠googlecode.com

Updates: Labels: -Component-Tools Component-ExternalTools Comment #1 on issue 254 by tudor.gi...(a)gmail.com: inFusion default initializer export to MSE http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=254 (No comment was entered for this change.)

10 years, 11 months

minimap in Glamour-Roassal

by Usman Bhatti

Hello, I am trying to create a roassal minimap in a glamour browser. But I do not get a minimap when pressing m key. It might be something to do with how keystrokes are interpreted in Glamour. can you have a look? Here's a simple browser with a roassal visualization (adapted from one of ben's mail on moose-dev). | browser viewHack | browser := GLMTabulator new. browser column: #list; column: #drawing. browser transmit to: #list; andShow: [ :a | a list ]. browser … [View More]

11 years, 1 month

Issue 942 in moose-technology: Fame-ImportExport - XML Export - transformation of \n and \t not working.

by moose-technology＠googlecode.com

Status: New Owner: ---- Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium New issue 942 by v.blonde...(a)gmail.com: Fame-ImportExport - XML Export - transformation of \n and \t not working. http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=942 In the class FMXMLPrinter of the Fame-ImportExport package, the method 'primitive:' doesn't remplace the Character cr by \n and Character tab by \t as expected in the source code. Indeed the affectation of the local block variable by this line of … [View More]

11 years, 1 month

Re: Issue 113 in moose-technology: Roassal should support lazy edges when used through the Mondrian API

by moose-technology＠googlecode.com

Updates: Summary: Roassal should support lazy edges when used through the Mondrian API Status: Labels: -Component-Mondrian Component-Roassal Comment #10 on issue 113 by tu...(a)tudorgirba.com: Roassal should support lazy edges when used through the Mondrian API http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=113 No, it does not. But, it should. The idea is that the following Mondrian script should work: view edge: #edge from: 1 to: 2. view node: 1. view node: 2. For this, … [View More]

11 years, 2 months

Issue 690 in moose-technology: Change the font size of labels in a chart

by moose-technology＠googlecode.com

Status: New Owner: ---- Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium Component-EyeSee New issue 690 by andreho...(a)gmail.com: Change the font size of labels in a chart http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=690 Change the font size of labels in a chart using #defaultFontSize: is not working.

11 years, 3 months

Issue 900 in moose-technology: Glamour-Roassal should be able to work with raw ROView not just ROMondrianBuilder

by moose-technology＠googlecode.com

Status: New Owner: ---- Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium New issue 900 by benjamin...(a)gmail.com: Glamour-Roassal should be able to work with raw ROView not just ROMondrianBuilder http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=900 Hopefully, I've cracked this. In response to my own query: "Could something like a GLMMorphicRoassalRawRenderer be added to the Glamour-Roassal interface? - which would pass an unencumbered ROView to the paintingBlock. It is not really a … [View More]Glamour-Roassal interface at the moment, more of a Glamour-Mondrian interface." With the attached slice you can now go... browser transmit to: #graphic andShow: [ :a | a roassal newView: [ ROView new @ RODraggable ] ; painting: [:view :input | view add: ROElement new] ]. After loading you can first try the new & old tests in 'Glamour-Tests-Roassal' then try 'GLMRawRoassalExamplesBrowser open' I surprised myself that I got this far. A few times I hit a brick wall and was going to submit a half done proof-of-concept, but then just kept digging. Apart from hopefully getting integrated, some critical feedback would appreciated. A few points for review... 1. I had considered using #viewPrototype: with an instance to copy, but then I wasn't sure how deep I should copy it to produce a new view. So using a block with newView: seemed the safer path (and it also feels like it opens up some interesting possibilities, even if I can't think what they are at the moment) 2. I noticed that GLMRoassalPresentation>>renderOn: had a flag 'This should be the responsibility of the view'. This method was one that I previously copied and modified for GLMRoassalRawPresentation in my "Interactive Roassal" experiment. There I removed the calls to #applyLayout and #populateMenuOn since these were MNU for ROView (which had replaced ROMondrianViewBuilder). This time I pushed these two calls into ROMondrianViewBuilder>>preOpen, where ROView>>preOpen is left empty. I'm note sure I'm happy with #preOpen as a name but it was the best I could come up with, since I also refactored ROMondrianViewBuilder>>open to use it. 3. GLMMorphicRoassalRenderer>>render: had hardcoded reference to #stack with "ROMorph on: view stack" so I pushed the required difference into ROMondrianBuilder>>newMorph and ROView>>newMorph. 4. GLMMorphicRoassalRenderer>>actOnPresentationUpdate had hardcoded use of #stack in "setView: aView stack" so I pushed that into ROMondrianViewBuilder>>onMorph: and ROView>>onMorph: 5. GLMMorphicRoassalRenderer>>actOnPresentationUpdate had hardcoded ROMondrianViewBuilder so I modified this to use the block passed to GLMRoassalPresentation>>newView: . 6. I copied GLMRoassalMorphicTest to GLMRawRoassalMorphicTest with required modifications. 7. I copied GLMRoassalExamplesBrowser to GLMRawRoassalExamplesBrowser with required modifications. [View Less]

11 years, 3 months

Re: Issue 735 in moose-technology: OverviewPyramid raises Zero Divide

by moose-technology＠googlecode.com

Updates: Summary: OverviewPyramid raises Zero Divide Comment #4 on issue 735 by tudor.gi...(a)gmail.com: OverviewPyramid raises Zero Divide http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=735 (No comment was entered for this change.)

11 years, 4 months

Issue 918 in moose-technology: GLMTreePresentation display artifact when selection is set to an unexpanded node

by moose-technology＠googlecode.com

Status: New Owner: ---- Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium New issue 918 by benjamin...(a)gmail.com: GLMTreePresentation display artifact when selection is set to an unexpanded node http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=918 Execute the following Workspace script, then in the left pane, click on $X while it is not expanded. An display artifact appears on the first line as shown in attached image, which is the an overlap of the the hidden third level $X and $O. … [View More]

11 years, 4 months

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

Moose-dev June 2013