Moose-dev January 2013

moose-dev@list.inf.unibe.ch

16 participants
121 discussions

Re: Issue 736 in moose-technology: Moose crashes when importing Citezen (OrderedCollection(Object)>>doesNotUnderstand: #unsafeAdd:)
by moose-technology＠googlecode.com 23 Jun '13

23 Jun '13

Updates: Summary: Moose crashes when importing Citezen (OrderedCollection(Object)>>doesNotUnderstand: #unsafeAdd:) Comment #3 on issue 736 by tudor.gi...(a)gmail.com: Moose crashes when importing Citezen (OrderedCollection(Object)>>doesNotUnderstand: #unsafeAdd:) http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=736 (No comment was entered for this change.)

4 15

Issue 647 in moose-technology: Integrate torch package visualization
by moose-technology＠googlecode.com 23 Jun '13

23 Jun '13

Status: New Owner: ---- Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium New issue 647 by cy.delau...(a)gmail.com: Integrate torch package visualization http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=647 Maybe it would be a good idea (?) to use / integrate the torch packages visualization in moose ? http://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/docs/00/53/15/08/PDF/Uqui10a-Torch-WCRE10.p…

2 4

Re: Issue 469 in moose-technology: integrate Kontractor
by moose-technology＠googlecode.com 23 Jun '13

23 Jun '13

Updates: Labels: Milestone-4.3 Comment #4 on issue 469 by tudor.girba: integrate Kontractor http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=469 What is the status of this?

1 3

Re: Issue 437 in moose-technology: Text is not affected by zooming in Mondrian
by moose-technology＠googlecode.com 23 Jun '13

23 Jun '13

Comment #1 on issue 437 by alexandre.bergel: Text is not affected by zooming in Mondrian http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=437 Situation has been slightly improved, but this is clearly not satisfactory

1 4

Issue 907 in moose-technology: VerveineJ does not export source anchors for FAMIXAnnotationType and FAMIXAnnotationTypeAttribute
by moose-technology＠googlecode.com 19 Jun '13

19 Jun '13

Status: New Owner: ---- CC: anquetil...(a)gmail.com Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium Component-Famix New issue 907 by tu...(a)tudorgirba.com: VerveineJ does not export source anchors for FAMIXAnnotationType and FAMIXAnnotationTypeAttribute http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=907 When we have an explicit annotation in the code, we should also get the source anchor associated with it. For example, in the below case, SomeAnnotation.java should be associated with SomeAnnotation: SomeAnnotation.java @Documented @Target({ ElementType.FIELD }) @Retention(RetentionPolicy.CLASS) public @interface SomeAnnotation {...} The same applies for the contained FAMIXAnnotationTypeAttributes.

1 3

Issue 870 in moose-technology: ROFocusView focuses on the wrong spot
by moose-technology＠googlecode.com 04 Jun '13

04 Jun '13

Status: New Owner: ---- CC: alexandr...(a)gmail.com Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium Component-Roassal Component-Glamour New issue 870 by tu...(a)tudorgirba.com: ROFocusView focuses on the wrong spot http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=870 Open a Roassal Easel and paste this: | node | node := view node: #a. ROFocusView new on: node view: view raw. The node is selected somewhere at the bottom. The reason is likely to be that the canvas has a static size, instead of adapting by default to the size of the surrounding pane

1 1

Issue 894 in moose-technology: Roassal revised ROSelection and example
by moose-technology＠googlecode.com 07 May '13

07 May '13

Status: New Owner: ---- Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium New issue 894 by benjamin...(a)gmail.com: Roassal revised ROSelection and example http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=894 Initially I contributed ROSelection as part of the rubberbanding feature. The attached changeset generalizes it a bit and provides the folllowing example of its use. ------------- activeSelection := ROSelection new onInclusion: [ :element | ROHighlightElement on: element color: Color red ]; onExclusion: [ :element | ROUnhighlightElement on: element ]. statusBar := (ROElement on: activeSelection) + (ROLabel text: [ :el | el model asString ]) + ROBox white. view stack add: statusBar. statusBar translateTo: 0 @ 480. view shape label. view interaction on: ROMouseLeftClick do: [ :ann | activeSelection clear. activeSelection add: ann element. ]. view nodes: #(1 2 3 4 5). view gridLayout. --------------- There are two things I need help with: 1. Deselecting all elements when clicking on the background.** 2. Multiple selection, which if I knew the right way to work with the announcement events, would conceptually be as simple as the following modification... [ :ann | ann isShiftClicked ifFalse: [ activeSelection clear ]. activeSelection add: ann element. ]. **may also relate to Issue 884 comment #9 . Attachments: ROSelectionAndExample.1.cs 1.4 KB

2 12

Issue 895 in moose-technology: Lack of entities in verveineJ model
by moose-technology＠googlecode.com 07 May '13

07 May '13

Status: New Owner: ---- Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium Component-VerveineJ Milestone-4.7 New issue 895 by andreho...(a)gmail.com: Lack of entities in verveineJ model http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=895 I'm parsing the single .java attached file (I have also copied in the end of this message), and I have some points: - A stub class FileUtils is not created. As consequence the receiver os the static invocation "FileUtils.close(ti)" (see last line) is "nil". - A stub class ArchiveScanner (superclass) is not created. What do you think about that? In addition (I believe it is OK): - A stub class Map is created as FAMIXParameterizableClass (it should just be used to Generics, no?). - A 'V' FAMIXParameterType is created - A Comparable is created as FAMIXParameterizedType Maybe these three points are coming from the class Map in Java, then it is OK. Basically this is the code attached: ========= public class TarScanner extends ArchiveScanner { ... protected void fillMapsFromArchive(Resource src, String encoding, Map fileEntries, Map matchFileEntries, Map dirEntries, Map matchDirEntries) { TarEntry entry = null; TarInputStream ti = null; try { try { ti = new TarInputStream(src.getInputStream()); } catch (IOException ex) { throw new BuildException("problem opening " + srcFile, ex); } while ((entry = ti.getNextEntry()) != null) { Resource r = new TarResource(src, entry); String name = entry.getName(); if (entry.isDirectory()) { name = trimSeparator(name); dirEntries.put(name, r); if (match(name)) { matchDirEntries.put(name, r); } } else { fileEntries.put(name, r); if (match(name)) { matchFileEntries.put(name, r); } } } } catch (IOException ex) { throw new BuildException("problem reading " + srcFile, ex); } finally { FileUtils.close(ti); } } ... =========

1 8

importers page
by Tudor Girba 28 Apr '13

28 Apr '13

Hi, I created a page dedicated to importing instructions: http://www.moosetechnology.org/docs/importers A good example of how these instructions should look like can be found here: http://www.moosetechnology.org/docs/importers/importJavaWithinFusion We would need more detailed information about: - Import C# with PMCS http://www.moosetechnology.org/docs/importers/importCSharpWithPMCS - Import C with CAnalyzer http://www.moosetechnology.org/docs/importers/importCWithCAnalyzer Cheers, Doru -- www.tudorgirba.com "Obvious things are difficult to teach."

7 14

node: forIt: in Roassal takes too long
by Usman Bhatti 07 Apr '13

07 Apr '13

Hello, I am trying to arrange two sets of nodes in verticalLineLayout with Roassal, and within a set, the nodes are arranged in a gridLayout. The script below allows works fine except that the execution time is too long when the number of nodes is large and hence I am unable to achieve multi-layout visualization for large number of nodes. view := ROMondrianViewBuilder new. view shape rectangle withoutBorder. view node:#aaa forIt:[ view shape rectangle. view nodes: (1 to: 10000). view gridLayout. ]. view shape rectangle withoutBorder. view node:#bbb forIt:[ view shape rectangle. view nodes: (1 to: 1000). view gridLayout. ]. view verticalLineLayout. view open Can you please have a look or could you suggest an alternate solution? I have created my own custom layout but that is tied to the structure of my nodes and hence not generic. tx. usman

5 10

← Newer
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
...
13
Older →

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

Moose-dev January 2013