Moose-dev January 2013

moose-dev@list.inf.unibe.ch

16 participants
121 discussions

Re: Issue 156 in moose-technology: The table presentation for Glamour should provide dynamic sorting and column manipulation
by moose-technology＠googlecode.com 19 Apr '14

19 Apr '14

Updates: Summary: The table presentation for Glamour should provide dynamic sorting and column manipulation Comment #14 on issue 156 by tudor.gi...(a)gmail.com: The table presentation for Glamour should provide dynamic sorting and column manipulation http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=156 (No comment was entered for this change.)

1 1

Re: Issue 254 in moose-technology: inFusion default initializer export to MSE
by moose-technology＠googlecode.com 19 Apr '14

19 Apr '14

Updates: Labels: -Component-Tools Component-ExternalTools Comment #1 on issue 254 by tudor.gi...(a)gmail.com: inFusion default initializer export to MSE http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=254 (No comment was entered for this change.)

1 2

Re: Issue 113 in moose-technology: Roassal should support lazy edges when used through the Mondrian API
by moose-technology＠googlecode.com 27 Jan '14

27 Jan '14

Updates: Summary: Roassal should support lazy edges when used through the Mondrian API Status: Labels: -Component-Mondrian Component-Roassal Comment #10 on issue 113 by tu...(a)tudorgirba.com: Roassal should support lazy edges when used through the Mondrian API http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=113 No, it does not. But, it should. The idea is that the following Mondrian script should work: view edge: #edge from: 1 to: 2. view node: 1. view node: 2. For this, the edge creation should be evaluated only after all nodes are created. I changed the entry title and labels.

1 6

Issue 690 in moose-technology: Change the font size of labels in a chart
by moose-technology＠googlecode.com 09 Jan '14

09 Jan '14

Status: New Owner: ---- Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium Component-EyeSee New issue 690 by andreho...(a)gmail.com: Change the font size of labels in a chart http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=690 Change the font size of labels in a chart using #defaultFontSize: is not working.

1 2

Issue 900 in moose-technology: Glamour-Roassal should be able to work with raw ROView not just ROMondrianBuilder
by moose-technology＠googlecode.com 18 Dec '13

18 Dec '13

Status: New Owner: ---- Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium New issue 900 by benjamin...(a)gmail.com: Glamour-Roassal should be able to work with raw ROView not just ROMondrianBuilder http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=900 Hopefully, I've cracked this. In response to my own query: "Could something like a GLMMorphicRoassalRawRenderer be added to the Glamour-Roassal interface? - which would pass an unencumbered ROView to the paintingBlock. It is not really a Glamour-Roassal interface at the moment, more of a Glamour-Mondrian interface." With the attached slice you can now go... browser transmit to: #graphic andShow: [ :a | a roassal newView: [ ROView new @ RODraggable ] ; painting: [:view :input | view add: ROElement new] ]. After loading you can first try the new & old tests in 'Glamour-Tests-Roassal' then try 'GLMRawRoassalExamplesBrowser open' I surprised myself that I got this far. A few times I hit a brick wall and was going to submit a half done proof-of-concept, but then just kept digging. Apart from hopefully getting integrated, some critical feedback would appreciated. A few points for review... 1. I had considered using #viewPrototype: with an instance to copy, but then I wasn't sure how deep I should copy it to produce a new view. So using a block with newView: seemed the safer path (and it also feels like it opens up some interesting possibilities, even if I can't think what they are at the moment) 2. I noticed that GLMRoassalPresentation>>renderOn: had a flag 'This should be the responsibility of the view'. This method was one that I previously copied and modified for GLMRoassalRawPresentation in my "Interactive Roassal" experiment. There I removed the calls to #applyLayout and #populateMenuOn since these were MNU for ROView (which had replaced ROMondrianViewBuilder). This time I pushed these two calls into ROMondrianViewBuilder>>preOpen, where ROView>>preOpen is left empty. I'm note sure I'm happy with #preOpen as a name but it was the best I could come up with, since I also refactored ROMondrianViewBuilder>>open to use it. 3. GLMMorphicRoassalRenderer>>render: had hardcoded reference to #stack with "ROMorph on: view stack" so I pushed the required difference into ROMondrianBuilder>>newMorph and ROView>>newMorph. 4. GLMMorphicRoassalRenderer>>actOnPresentationUpdate had hardcoded use of #stack in "setView: aView stack" so I pushed that into ROMondrianViewBuilder>>onMorph: and ROView>>onMorph: 5. GLMMorphicRoassalRenderer>>actOnPresentationUpdate had hardcoded ROMondrianViewBuilder so I modified this to use the block passed to GLMRoassalPresentation>>newView: . 6. I copied GLMRoassalMorphicTest to GLMRawRoassalMorphicTest with required modifications. 7. I copied GLMRoassalExamplesBrowser to GLMRawRoassalExamplesBrowser with required modifications.

5 18

Re: Issue 735 in moose-technology: OverviewPyramid raises Zero Divide
by moose-technology＠googlecode.com 05 Dec '13

05 Dec '13

Updates: Summary: OverviewPyramid raises Zero Divide Comment #4 on issue 735 by tudor.gi...(a)gmail.com: OverviewPyramid raises Zero Divide http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=735 (No comment was entered for this change.)

1 2

Issue 772 in moose-technology: Moose Panel > ST importer > incorrect selection highlighting
by moose-technology＠googlecode.com 20 Nov '13

20 Nov '13

Status: New Owner: ---- Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium New issue 772 by google....(a)ben.coman.com.au: Moose Panel > ST importer > incorrect selection highlighting http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=772 Upon removing an item from a list, the next item down becomes higlighted like it is selected and the highlighting cannot be removed. It is not really selected. How to reproduce the problem: 1. Unzipped Moose Suite 4.6 Development 2. Ran Moose.app\Contents\Windows\Squeak.exe 3. WorldMenu > Moose > Moose Panel 4. Clicked the ST downarrow icon. (btw, you might think about giving the dialog that pops up a title) 5. In the [Initial list] tab selected the nine "AST-*" entries and clicked the three-right-arrows. 6. In the [Selection] tab, selected "AST-Semantic" and clicked the three-left-arrows. The row below that - "AST-Semantic-Binding" - is now highlighted as selected. 7. Try to get rid of the selection highlighting on "AST-Semantic-Binding"

1 1

Issue 732 in moose-technology: Moose should improve the visuals for larger fonts
by moose-technology＠googlecode.com 17 Nov '13

17 Nov '13

Status: New Owner: ---- Labels: Type-Enhancement Priority-Medium Usability New issue 732 by tudor.gi...(a)gmail.com: Moose should improve the visuals for larger fonts http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=732 The icons from GLMUIThemeExtraIcons and from MooseIcons should be saved in larger resolutions (currently, they are in 16x16). Mondrian should offer a default class variable for the size of nodes and the width of nodes and edges. These should be settable via global settings.

1 2

Re: Issue 362 in moose-technology: Add commands to create/delete Hismo models
by moose-technology＠googlecode.com 17 Nov '13

17 Nov '13

Comment #5 on issue 362 by alexandr...(a)gmail.com: Add commands to create/delete Hismo models http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=362 In Moose-Hismo-AlexandreBergel.57 , you can now delete an hismomodel. We need a way to create an hismo model

2 2

Issue 666 in moose-technology: package name in DSM
by moose-technology＠googlecode.com 17 Nov '13

17 Nov '13

Status: New Owner: ---- Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium Component-DSM New issue 666 by jannik.l...(a)gmail.com: package name in DSM http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=666 The package name in DSM, specially in encaps DSM are not well placed.

1 3

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

Moose-dev January 2013