Moose-dev July 2011

moose-dev@list.inf.unibe.ch

26 participants
178 discussions

by Tudor Girba

Hi, I created a page dedicated to importing instructions: http://www.moosetechnology.org/docs/importers A good example of how these instructions should look like can be found here: http://www.moosetechnology.org/docs/importers/importJavaWithinFusion We would need more detailed information about: - Import C# with PMCS http://www.moosetechnology.org/docs/importers/importCSharpWithPMCS - Import C with CAnalyzer http://www.moosetechnology.org/docs/importers/importCWithCAnalyzer Cheers, Doru -- www.tudorgirba.com "Obvious things are difficult to teach."

11 years, 7 months

Issue 640 in moose-technology: Get the axis labels in a lineDiagram

by moose-technology＠googlecode.com

Status: New Owner: andreho...(a)gmail.com Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium Component-EyeSee New issue 640 by andreho...(a)gmail.com: Get the axis labels in a lineDiagram http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=640 Get the axis labels in a lineDiagram in not working. See example below: | diag factory | factory := ESDummyFactory new. factory yValues: #(22 25 13 16 24 28 35 24 32 24 46 12). factory identifiers: #('January' 'February' 'March' 'April' 'Mai' 'June' 'July' 'August' 'September' 'October' 'November' 'December'). diag := ESDiagramRenderer new. (diag lineDiagram) y: #yValue; width: 500; height: 400; lineWidth: 5; defaultFontSize: 12; identifier: #identifier; labels: [:each | each]; defaultColor: Color blue; yAxisLabel: 'Clients'; regularAxis; deviationValue: 22; deviationDescription: 'avg 2006'; models: factory buildDummies. "startLineAtZero;" ^ diag open

11 years, 9 months

Issue 637 in moose-technology: VerveineJ should show an invocation to the default constructor

by moose-technology＠googlecode.com

Status: New Owner: ---- CC: anquetil...(a)gmail.com Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium Component-VerveineJ New issue 637 by tu...(a)tudorgirba.com: VerveineJ should show an invocation to the default constructor http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=637 A call to the default constructor should be modeled like: - create a stub constructor in the target class - create an invocation to the constructor See the attached class for a sample. Attachments: DefaultConstructor.java 184 bytes

11 years, 9 months

Issue 636 in moose-technology: VerveineJ should set hasClassScope

by moose-technology＠googlecode.com

Status: New Owner: ---- CC: anquetil...(a)gmail.com Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium Component-VerveineJ New issue 636 by tu...(a)tudorgirba.com: VerveineJ should set hasClassScope http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=636 Static fields or methods should be marked with hasClassScope=true: public static int attributeWithClassScope; public static void methodWithClassScope() {} See the attached sample class. Attachments: ClassScope.java 179 bytes

11 years, 9 months

Issue 650 in moose-technology: Mondrian multiple selection uses a broken metaphor

by moose-technology＠googlecode.com

Status: New Owner: ---- CC: alexandr...(a)gmail.com Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium Component-Mondrian Milestone-4.5 New issue 650 by tu...(a)tudorgirba.com: Mondrian multiple selection uses a broken metaphor http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=650 The multiple selection mechanism is confusing because you have to release the mouse to start selecting. It should be disabled until it works properly.

12 years, 2 months

Re: Issue 396 in moose-technology: Mondrian should provide teh start and end nodes in the edge action

by moose-technology＠googlecode.com

Updates: Cc: tudor.girba Comment #1 on issue 396 by alexandre.bergel: Mondrian should provide teh start and end nodes in the edge action http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=396 I started to work on this (testHandlerOnEdge). However, I am unsure for few things. view interaction on: MOMouseDown do: [ :v | ... ] What v is supposed to be? The announcement or the value on which one has clicked? It has to be the value I believe. However, it may brake already existing code. We could leave it like this, and introduce on:withValueDo: What do you think? Cheers, Alexandre

12 years, 2 months

Re: Issue 113 in moose-technology: Lazy edges in Mondrian

by moose-technology＠googlecode.com

Updates: Labels: -Milestone-4.2 Comment #5 on issue 113 by tudor.gi...(a)gmail.com: Lazy edges in Mondrian http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=113 Should we postpone this one until later?

12 years, 2 months

Issue 501 in moose-technology: Cache independence

by moose-technology＠googlecode.com

Status: New Owner: ---- Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium New issue 501 by alexandr...(a)gmail.com: Cache independence http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=501 The core of Mondrian is not independent of the cache implementation. The logic of Mondrian rely on the cache to implement its semantics. This is obviously wrong. -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= bounds "Answer the bounds of the receiver." "the bounds is has an absolute origin" "Note that the bounds computed above, may have (and it is likely to) a different origin. The reason is that the layout is in charge to position the nodes properly" | basicBounds | boundsCache ifNotNil: [ ^ boundsCache ]. "We check if the shape if present" self shapeBoundsAt: self shape ifPresent: [ :b | ^ boundsCache := b ]. basicBounds := self shape computeBoundsFor: self. self shapeBoundsAt: self shape put: basicBounds. ^ boundsCache := basicBounds -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= translateAbsoluteCacheBy: aPoint absoluteBoundsCache ifNil: [ ^ self ]. absoluteBoundsCache := absoluteBoundsCache translateBy: aPoint -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Thanks to Santiago Vidal for pointing this out!

12 years, 6 months

Issue 503 in moose-technology: Abstract classes and Hapao

by moose-technology＠googlecode.com

Status: New Owner: ---- CC: vhane...(a)gmail.com Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium Component-Spy New issue 503 by alexandr...(a)gmail.com: Abstract classes and Hapao http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=503 Gaëtan le Brun suggested to remove abstract classes before running the test in Hapao. This makes sense

12 years, 6 months

Issue 601 in moose-technology: Covered methods and tests

by moose-technology＠googlecode.com

Status: New Owner: ---- Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium Component-Hapao New issue 601 by alexandr...(a)gmail.com: Covered methods and tests http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=601 It would be good to see what are the tests that _indirectly_ tests a methods. Thanks Laurent & Patrick

12 years, 6 months

Jump to page:

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

Moose-dev July 2011