Moose-dev July 2011

moose-dev@list.inf.unibe.ch

26 participants
178 discussions

[Glamour] web-render a tabulator inside a html div

by Cyrille Delaunay

Hello. I currently looking at how to render the GLMDashboard in Glamour-seaside. I already tried several things but my main problem is: In the 'renderOn:' method of my SGLDashboardPresenter , if I write : html div with: [ self render: (self firstColumnPanesFrom: self browser) last on: html ] ].

13 years, 11 months

Which Pharo version do I need for loading Glamour?

by Alex Schenkman

Hi list, Loading Glamour on Pharo 1.2.2-12353 gives me the following warning: This package depends on the following classes: SubscriptionRegistry You must resolve these dependencies before you will be able to load these definitions: SubscriptionRegistry>>glmSubscriptions I did: Gofer new squeaksource: 'Glamour'; package: 'ConfigurationOfGlamour'; load. (Smalltalk at: #ConfigurationOfGlamour) perform: #loadDefault Proceeding gives more warnings: This package depends on the following classes: SubscriptionRegistry You must resolve these dependencies before you will be able to load these definitions: SubscriptionRegistry>>hasHandlerFor: SubscriptionRegistry>>lookFor: SubscriptionRegistry>>lookFor:ifNone: SubscriptionRegistry>>unsubscribeForEvent: Proceeding loads but fails executing: GLMBasicExamples open Thanks!

13 years, 11 months

Issue 682 in moose-technology: The basic examples don't show the usage of format

by moose-technology＠googlecode.com

Status: New Owner: ---- Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium New issue 682 by step...(a)stack.nl: The basic examples don't show the usage of format http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=682 The Glamour examples should be complete. There is currently no example showing the usage of format: Add a method to GLMBasicExamples: formatAsWords "self new formatAsWords openOn: (1 to: 100)" <glmBrowser: 'Format' input: '(1 to: 100)'> | browser | browser := GLMTabulator new. browser row: #list. browser showOn: #list; using: [ browser tree format: [ :x | x asWords]; display: [:x | x]]. ^ browser Glamour-Examples-StephanEggermont.187

13 years, 11 months

Issue 683 in moose-technology: MessageNotUnderstood: receiver of "sender" is nil

by moose-technology＠googlecode.com

Status: New Owner: ---- Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium New issue 683 by vonbecm...(a)gmail.com: MessageNotUnderstood: receiver of "sender" is nil http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=683 Moose: 4.5 Pharo image: Pharo1.3a#13258 Virtual machine used: Croquet Closure Cog VM [CoInterpreter VMMaker-oscog.51] Platform Name: unix Class browser used (if applicable): OBSystemBrowserAdaptor Steps to reproduce: #.select a model #.press left button and select Visualize>>Overview pyramid Actual Result: MessageNotUnderstood: receiver of "sender" is nil Expected Result: to visualize "Overview Pyramid" * Type-Defect Attachments: PharoScreenshot.1.png 87.7 KB PharoDebug.log 34.8 KB

13 years, 11 months

Re: PetitParser

by Lukas Renggli

Hi Damien, I reply to the Moose list because this might be interesting to other people too. > I have some question/remarks about PetitParser: > > - it is not clear what PPParser>match* are used for. After reading the > source code of the implementors, it looks like you want to know if two > parsers are equal. Why would you do that? Why are the methods called > match* and not equal*? I guess you are referring to the extension methods in the package 'PetitAnalyzer'? The methods #matches:, #matchesIn:. #matchingRangesIn:, ... are part of the core package 'PetitParser' and are well commented (I think). The methods in the package 'PetitAnalyzer' are called match*, because this is not an equality operation. They do not only support the comparison of two parsers, but can also compare patterns with parser instances (essentially this is a little Prolog engine, very similar to the refactoring engine). The matching and rewriting of parsers is explained in my PhD (http://scg.unibe.ch/archive/phd/renggli-phd.pdf) in Section "6.2.5 Declarative Grammar Rewriting". For example: " matches a sequence of any two parsers that are the same " any := PPPattern any. pattern := any , any. pattern asParser match: $a asParser , $b inContext: Dictionary new. " --> false, because $a and $b are different " pattern asParser match: $a asParser , $a asParser inContext: Dictionary new. " --> true, because $a and $a are the same " If the match is successful, the patterns are bound to the matching parsers. In the example above the dictionary would contain an entry: any -> $a asParser There are many tests in PPSearcherTest. Fancy patterns you can also see in PPRewriterTest and PPOptimizer. > - PPParser>>matchList* do never refer to self (but to call themselves > recursively). This looks correct to me. This is to recurse into the graph of parsers. > - Why is #def: not defined in PPUnresolvedParser? You implemented it > in PPParser. It might be useful for other parsers, but do you have an > example? PPParser is a superclass of PPUnresolvedParser, therefore you can send #def: to any instance of PPUnresolvedParser. PPUnresolvedParser and #def: are nice to quickly hack something ugly together, better not (over)use them ... Lukas -- Lukas Renggli www.lukas-renggli.ch

13 years, 11 months

Famix ADL

by Usman Bhatti

Hi all, We are working to develop an Architecture Description Language (ADL) in Moose. The objective of the development is to define a language that allows to specify different components of an architecture so that these entities can be manipulated directly (analysis, visualization, etc). The architecture definition will be used to check rule conformance, for example. However, we would not want to restrict ourselves to any particular usage of the ADL. Today, we have implemented a preliminary version of ADLFamix by implementing modules that actually contain MooseGroups. Based on these modules, we can now write Arki queries for rule-checkling, for example. Now, we are contemplating about the next step because different people implement different things in an ADL. Some describe rules that specify connectors that can exist between modules. However, this approach ties connectors to rules and we cannot define a connector without any rules associated. Connectors can be defined separately or these can also be inferred from Famix associations of the Famix entities contained in modules. Also, rules can be built into modules so that each one has its own repository (however, it is not always possible to associate a rule to any particular module). The purpose of the mail is to get feedback from the people on the group about an ADL in Moose and its features. We are thinking in terms of, but not limited to: 1) fundamental features (modules, connectors, rules, ??) 2) objectives: rule checking, architecture inference (e.g. reconstructing plug-ins from java models in moose), ?? 3) ?? thanx Moosecians @ RMod

13 years, 11 months

moose finder only works with fame properties

by Tudor Girba

Hi, I like this good energy of getting the metrics properly integrated in Moose. Currently, there are two mechanisms that are overlapping: 1. the Fame properties denoted by <MSEProperty: ...>. These are used both for import/export and for the UI 2. the Moose-specific properties denoted by <property: ...>. These are used only in the UI Of these, we should eliminate the second one by transforming all <property:> annotations into <MSEProperty:> ones. To get the incentives aligned, I now changed the MooseFinder to only work with the Fame properties. So, basically, at this point we have no reason to keep the old <property:> annotations. Next are the <navigation:> properties. I suspect we want to declare them as <MSEProperty:> as well, and mark them as <derived>. But, this in the second step. Cheers, Doru -- www.tudorgirba.com "Every now and then stop and ask yourself if the war you're fighting is the right one."

13 years, 11 months

Fwd: Jenkins build is back to normal : moose-latest-dev #496

by Tudor Girba

All tests are green again. Cheers, Doru Begin forwarded message: > From: admin(a)moosetechnology.org > Date: 16 July 2011 10:10:18 CEST > To: tudor(a)tudorgirba.com, simon.denier(a)gmail.com, cy.delaunay(a)gmail.com, alexandre(a)bergel.eu, stephane.ducasse(a)inria.fr, jannik.laval(a)inria.fr > Subject: Jenkins build is back to normal : moose-latest-dev #496 > > See <http://hudson.moosetechnology.org/job/moose-latest-dev/496/> > > -- www.tudorgirba.com "Value is always contextual."

13 years, 11 months

Mondrian: defaultMinimal configuration

by Veronica Isabel Uquillas Gomez

Hi Alexandre, Is the defaultMinimal configuration up-to-date? I tried it and it is loading a version of ConfigurationOfHealthReportProducer that does not exist... So I am wondering if I can rely on this minimal configuration in Mondrian. Regards, Veronica

13 years, 11 months

exporting model to mse? do they keep the metrics

by Stéphane Ducasse

Hi guys I could not find metrics in the saved MSE metrics like LOC that cannot be computed by moose. Are metrics saved? I remember writing tests to make sure that this was correct. In addition it would be good to be able to select some metrics to be exported to other formats. Stef

13 years, 12 months

← Newer
1
...
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
...
18
Older →

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

Moose-dev July 2011