Moose-dev December 2011

moose-dev@list.inf.unibe.ch

32 participants
167 discussions

Issue 761 in moose-technology: Missing method invocation with VerveineJ
by moose-technology＠googlecode.com 30 Nov '12

30 Nov '12

Status: Accepted Owner: ---- Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium Component-VerveineJ New issue 761 by anquetil...(a)gmail.com: Missing method invocation with VerveineJ http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=761 see discussion on mailing list: "invokingMethods broken in moose or inFamix" source code: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/stanbol/trunk/enhancer/engines/ke… The method getLinkedEntityTypes in org.apache.stanbol.enhancer.engines.keywordextraction.linking.EntityLinker has an empty collection of invokingMethods even though the method is invoked for example by "process()".

3 4

Issue 762 in moose-technology: VerveineJ keeps the history of old entities, when invoked from the Moose interface
by moose-technology＠googlecode.com 27 Nov '12

27 Nov '12

Status: New Owner: tudor.gi...(a)gmail.com Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium New issue 762 by usman.bh...(a)gmail.com: VerveineJ keeps the history of old entities, when invoked from the Moose interface http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=762 First, I invoke VerveineJ from Moose menu to analyse a program A. It analyses the program and imports its entities in a moose model. I invoke VJ once more from moose menu to analyse another program B. When VJ is executed and the entities of program B are imported, I also find in the same model the entities related to the program A. So, VerveineJ keeps the history of old entities, when invoked from Moose interface. I think the problem can be resolved by deleting output.mse once VJ has finished its analysis and the entities are imported in a moose model.

2 9

Issue 746 in moose-technology: VerveineJ should create parameters for methods with different signatures
by moose-technology＠googlecode.com 26 Nov '12

26 Nov '12

Status: New Owner: ---- CC: anquetil...(a)gmail.com Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium Component-VerveineJ Milestone-4.6 New issue 746 by tu...(a)tudorgirba.com: VerveineJ should create parameters for methods with different signatures http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=746 In some cases, calls to external libraries get reified as methods with proper signatures, but without parameters. I am trying to reproduce this using the following example (in ad_hoc/MultipleSignatures.java): package ad_hoc; import java.io.PrintWriter; import java.io.StringWriter; public class MultipleSignatures { public void callToRegularPrintStackTrace(Throwable t) { t.printStackTrace() } public void callToPrintStackTraceWithParam(Throwable t) { t.printStackTrace(new PrintWriter(new StringWriter())) } } I encountered a similar code in a case study. However, in this case, I cannot even get the parser to recognize both printStackTrace calls.

1 4

Issue 708 in moose-technology: Fame should accept comments both for properties and for meta descriptions
by moose-technology＠googlecode.com 25 Nov '12

25 Nov '12

Status: New Owner: ---- Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium Component-MooseCore Milestone-4.6 New issue 708 by tudor.gi...(a)gmail.com: Fame should accept comments both for properties and for meta descriptions http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=708 Currently, the MSEComment: is used to define comments of a property. SomeEntity>>someProperty <MSEProperty: ...> <MSEComment: 'comment'> This is used by the MetaBrowser but not by Fame. At the very least, we should add a means to add MSEComment: to the class side for the overall class.

1 5

Issue 650 in moose-technology: Mondrian multiple selection uses a broken metaphor
by moose-technology＠googlecode.com 14 Oct '12

14 Oct '12

Status: New Owner: ---- CC: alexandr...(a)gmail.com Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium Component-Mondrian Milestone-4.5 New issue 650 by tu...(a)tudorgirba.com: Mondrian multiple selection uses a broken metaphor http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=650 The multiple selection mechanism is confusing because you have to release the mouse to start selecting. It should be disabled until it works properly.

1 9

Re: Issue 396 in moose-technology: Mondrian should provide teh start and end nodes in the edge action
by moose-technology＠googlecode.com 03 Oct '12

03 Oct '12

Updates: Cc: tudor.girba Comment #1 on issue 396 by alexandre.bergel: Mondrian should provide teh start and end nodes in the edge action http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=396 I started to work on this (testHandlerOnEdge). However, I am unsure for few things. view interaction on: MOMouseDown do: [ :v | ... ] What v is supposed to be? The announcement or the value on which one has clicked? It has to be the value I believe. However, it may brake already existing code. We could leave it like this, and introduce on:withValueDo: What do you think? Cheers, Alexandre

1 1

Issue 698 in moose-technology: Mondrian does not properly raise MOElementSelection
by moose-technology＠googlecode.com 03 Oct '12

03 Oct '12

Status: New Owner: ---- CC: alexandr...(a)gmail.com Labels: Type-Defect Priority-High Component-Mondrian Milestone-4.6 New issue 698 by tudor.gi...(a)gmail.com: Mondrian does not properly raise MOElementSelection http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=698 When in Glamour, often when selecting a Mondrian element does not populate the selection because the MOCanvas does not raise MOElementSelection. The reason for this seems to be a race condition due to changes in the announcement framework. In the new announcement framework from Pharo 1.3, the order of announcements is not guaranteed. The issue seems to be due to the logic of the announcement: MOCanvas>>mouseUp: .. (lastEnteredGraphElement isNil not and: [ (lastEnteredGraphElement class ~~ MORoot and: [ lastEnteredGraphElement isNotSelected ])]) ifTrue: [ selectionEvent := MOElementSelection event: anEvent on: lastEnteredGraphElement. anEvent commandKeyPressed ifTrue: [ selectionEvent setAsMultiple ]. self announce: selectionEvent. anEvent wasHandled: true. ^ self ]. Sometimes, "lastEnteredGraphElement isNotSelected" returns false because somehow the element gets selected beforehand. This is most likely related to the fact that the selection of a node actually happens by handling the same MOElementSelection announcement: MOCanvas>>announce: anAnnouncement ... anAnnouncement element isNil ifFalse: [ anAnnouncement element announcer announce: anAnnouncement ]. self announcer announce: anAnnouncement. MOViewRenderer>>setUsefulHandlersForNodes ... self interaction on: MOElementSelection do: [:ann | ann isUnique ifTrue: [ self root allSelectedNodes do: [ :node | node deselect; announce: (MOElementDeselection new) ] ]. ann element select. self updateWindow ].

4 15

Re: Issue 113 in moose-technology: Lazy edges in Mondrian
by moose-technology＠googlecode.com 03 Oct '12

03 Oct '12

Updates: Labels: -Milestone-4.2 Comment #5 on issue 113 by tudor.gi...(a)gmail.com: Lazy edges in Mondrian http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=113 Should we postpone this one until later?

2 5

Issue 701 in moose-technology: Cut and Paste do not update a Glamour Port
by moose-technology＠googlecode.com 29 Jul '12

29 Jul '12

Status: New Owner: ---- CC: tudor.gi...(a)gmail.com Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium Component-Glamour New issue 701 by alexandr...(a)gmail.com: Cut and Paste do not update a Glamour Port http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=701 Email snippets: Regarding copy paste, indeed it seems that pasting a text does not update the port. Please open a ticket. ------- I found another strange behavior, likely to be a bug. Try: -=-=-=-=-=-= | browser | browser := GLMFinder new. browser text act: [:prez :v | prez text inspect ] on: $i entitled: 'Inspect'. browser openOn: 'hello world' -=-=-=-=-=-= If you type something and press cmd-i then you open an inspector on what you have typed. Now, do a cut and paste in the textpane, and press cmd-i. You have an inspector on 'hello world', no matter what you have cut&pasted.

1 6

Issue 501 in moose-technology: Cache independence
by moose-technology＠googlecode.com 01 Jun '12

01 Jun '12

Status: New Owner: ---- Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium New issue 501 by alexandr...(a)gmail.com: Cache independence http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=501 The core of Mondrian is not independent of the cache implementation. The logic of Mondrian rely on the cache to implement its semantics. This is obviously wrong. -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= bounds "Answer the bounds of the receiver." "the bounds is has an absolute origin" "Note that the bounds computed above, may have (and it is likely to) a different origin. The reason is that the layout is in charge to position the nodes properly" | basicBounds | boundsCache ifNotNil: [ ^ boundsCache ]. "We check if the shape if present" self shapeBoundsAt: self shape ifPresent: [ :b | ^ boundsCache := b ]. basicBounds := self shape computeBoundsFor: self. self shapeBoundsAt: self shape put: basicBounds. ^ boundsCache := basicBounds -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= translateAbsoluteCacheBy: aPoint absoluteBoundsCache ifNil: [ ^ self ]. absoluteBoundsCache := absoluteBoundsCache translateBy: aPoint -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Thanks to Santiago Vidal for pointing this out!

1 2

← Newer
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
...
17
Older →

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

Moose-dev December 2011