FamixAnnotationType and FamixAnnotationInstance are defined in Famix.Core,
so in theory they should be independent of any language. Here is the
comment from AnnotationIstance
AnnotationInstance is an instance of an AnnotationType. It links an
AnnotationType to an actual entity.
For example, the following is an AnnotationInstance in Java:
@Test(Timeout = 500)
This model fits java but not smalltalk pragmas. So is it ok to keep in
Famix core?
thanx
Nicolas and Usman
Hi,
There are 55 errors and 1 failure in Mondrian. It looks like the root of the issue is that the isShape method disappeared.
Cheers,
Doru
--
www.tudorgirba.com
Things happen when they happen,
not when you talk about them happening.
Usman and Nicolas, we are working on improving comments of Famix entities.
We thought that this thing is worth discussing.
Should all famix entities have annotations? For example, source-language,
source-anchor and associations cannot be annotated.
HI guys
I would like to do a small experiments:
how can I load Famix2.1 models into moose on pharo?
After I would like to see how we can connect Moose/VW and Moose/Pharo in case we get people with VW applications.
Stef
Hi Usman,
Thanks for committing the code related to smalltalkClass.
Now, the tests should never be put in the same package as the implementation.
So, I moved the test to Moose-Tests-SmalltalkImporter-LAN and I added a LAN prefix to the class name.
Cheers,
Doru
--
www.tudorgirba.com
"No matter how many recipes we know, we still value a chef."
Hi!
I have seen these initials in place of author name for some methods in moose.
It would be great to have a proper name and not initials.
Cheers,
Alexandre
--
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
Status: New
Owner: ----
CC: tudor.gi...(a)gmail.com
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium Component-Mondrian
New issue 558 by alexandr...(a)gmail.com: Better visitor for Mondrian
http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=558
Shapes are not correctly handed by MOVisitor. We should move all the
display:on: methods of the shapes in a visitor. The goal is to make the
core of Mondrian free of any canvas reference.
By doing so, we will produce exporter for HTML5 and Javascript...
Hi all,
I'm not sure if this is the right place for this, but I couldn't find a
moose-user list. I'm trying to set up Code City to see a physical
representation of our classes. When I use InFusion to export the MSE (3.0)
file, it writes this excerpt:
(FAMIX.Module (id: 2)
(parentPackage (ref: 5))
(*name '_unknown_file'*)
)
Does anyone know what the bold text should read?
Thanks,
Andrew